Gas question
#1
#2
I'd follow the factory recommendation.
As the MCS is supercharged, it does not behave like a normally-aspirated engine. The idea that premium gas "burns too hot" does not bode well for your friend's credibilty on this issue.
What is the MCS compression? Isn't it still 8.3:1? I assume this figure is low due to the supercharger. Can someone please explain what the effective compression ratio would be on full boost?
As the MCS is supercharged, it does not behave like a normally-aspirated engine. The idea that premium gas "burns too hot" does not bode well for your friend's credibilty on this issue.
What is the MCS compression? Isn't it still 8.3:1? I assume this figure is low due to the supercharger. Can someone please explain what the effective compression ratio would be on full boost?
#3
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Weeblegabber West (aka WLA)
Posts: 36,087
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
1 Post
Wench,
I'd definitely follow the MINI Owners Manual recommendation, which is that we only use Premium fuel, a minimum of 91 octane.
When I drive Wanda cross-country and back, if I have 94 octane fuel available, I will alternate, at half-tank only, with medium grade IF it is 90 octane, which some of it actually is.
Hope this helps.
Clover
I'd definitely follow the MINI Owners Manual recommendation, which is that we only use Premium fuel, a minimum of 91 octane.
When I drive Wanda cross-country and back, if I have 94 octane fuel available, I will alternate, at half-tank only, with medium grade IF it is 90 octane, which some of it actually is.
Hope this helps.
Clover
#4
I did some poking around, as I'm also curious about this question. I found this quote from MartyR -- sounds reasonable.
"MCS static CR is much lower because of the increase in effective CR when under boost generated by the supercharger. Effective CR under full boost (stock) with the MCS is well upwards of the 10.6:1 CR of the MC (probably approaching 13:1 or more). Pulley-equipped cars running higher boost levels are seeing even higher effective CRs. And the S motor is built accordingly."
Hope this helps... :smile:
"MCS static CR is much lower because of the increase in effective CR when under boost generated by the supercharger. Effective CR under full boost (stock) with the MCS is well upwards of the 10.6:1 CR of the MC (probably approaching 13:1 or more). Pulley-equipped cars running higher boost levels are seeing even higher effective CRs. And the S motor is built accordingly."
Hope this helps... :smile:
#5
#7
Originally Posted by Wench
thanks, all of you! I really appreciate all the feedback, having driven a truck for so long, I just wasn't sure... Hey Clover, where do you find 94 octane, I feel kinda stupid- I've never even seen it!
Trending Topics
#8
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Weeblegabber West (aka WLA)
Posts: 36,087
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by Wench
thanks, all of you! I really appreciate all the feedback, having driven a truck for so long, I just wasn't sure... Hey Clover, where do you find 94 octane, I feel kinda stupid- I've never even seen it!
I take a big roadtrip every Spring to visit my MINI friends before heading up to the MINIs On The Dragon Meet the first full weekend in May, every year.
Clover
#9
Octane question update:
I'm still trying to reconcile the Antiknock Index (pump octane rating) to the RON/MON numbers.
MINI has designed the MCS engine to operate on 98 RON octane. Unfortunately, U.S. "pump octane" (the Antiknock Index) is determined by the "RON+MON/2= pump octane" formula. The result of this is not knowing if you're buying more or less than you need, based on the orignal Euro design specs.
I know this is geeking-out a bit, but it's fun to learn new things... anybody have a source that lists the RON/MON octane ratings of U.S. gas?
I'm still trying to reconcile the Antiknock Index (pump octane rating) to the RON/MON numbers.
MINI has designed the MCS engine to operate on 98 RON octane. Unfortunately, U.S. "pump octane" (the Antiknock Index) is determined by the "RON+MON/2= pump octane" formula. The result of this is not knowing if you're buying more or less than you need, based on the orignal Euro design specs.
I know this is geeking-out a bit, but it's fun to learn new things... anybody have a source that lists the RON/MON octane ratings of U.S. gas?
#11
#12
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Weeblegabber West (aka WLA)
Posts: 36,087
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by hugh
At a Mini-Picnic in north Jersey last weekend, someone with an 05MCS told me since we can't get 91 octane in NJ or PA, he puts in a half tank of 89 and a half of 93...says that might = 91.
Anyone ???
hs
Anyone ???
hs
Clover
#13
#14
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Weeblegabber West (aka WLA)
Posts: 36,087
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by SB
When down here you need to get off the beaten path to fill up. Then you can get some good go juice for Wanda. 190 proof.
Clover
#16
I found one of those "everything you ever wanted to know about" sites on the net (this one deals with gasoline, of course). According to the site, octane ratings do indeed follow mixing ratios. With this in mind, 93+89 octane will equal 91.
You've been warned -- it's pretty dry reading...
Gasoline Geek site
You've been warned -- it's pretty dry reading...
Gasoline Geek site
#17
message 2063
http://townhall-talk.edmunds.com/WebX?13@@.eea6c81/2062
Check out my question #2063 and the answer from somebody from Canada and his experiences with the various octanes.
hs
Check out my question #2063 and the answer from somebody from Canada and his experiences with the various octanes.
hs
#18
Sunoco uses the blending technique at the pump to get their various grades out of two ground tanks. I have been running 93 (BP) on most fillups and this last time put in 89 (Mid-Grade) into a half tank of 93. I'm not running a pully on my 2005 MCS and didn't notice much difference... may a bit quicker... but it was cooler outside also. I suspect it would take some instrumentation (dyno) and controlled experiments to really get some definitive answers.
My opinion after reading about this quite a bit, on this forum and other car forums, is that beyond a certain point, more octane does you no good... and taken much above the required amount, it hurts performance. The flame front is slower, given the same compression and conditions, on higher octane fuel.
My opinion after reading about this quite a bit, on this forum and other car forums, is that beyond a certain point, more octane does you no good... and taken much above the required amount, it hurts performance. The flame front is slower, given the same compression and conditions, on higher octane fuel.
#19
beta testing octanes
Thanks, Solarmax. I didn't know Sunoco blended on site. But wouldn't you want to try more than just one tank of hybrid before drawing conclusions?
I'm going to try it for two or three tankfuls and report back.
Whoops, just did some 'rizmatic. Say I drive 20,000 miles @ 29mpg; what I'm now getting. Here in NJ, 93 is $2.20. That rounds off to about 700 gallons. Cost: $1540.
Octane 89 is $2.10. So 350 gallons = $735. 350 gallons of 93 = $770.
Total: $1505. vs $1540 = $35 per year.
At the risk of sounding like a spoiled rich kid, it's interesting but not worth the effort.
hs
I'm going to try it for two or three tankfuls and report back.
Whoops, just did some 'rizmatic. Say I drive 20,000 miles @ 29mpg; what I'm now getting. Here in NJ, 93 is $2.20. That rounds off to about 700 gallons. Cost: $1540.
Octane 89 is $2.10. So 350 gallons = $735. 350 gallons of 93 = $770.
Total: $1505. vs $1540 = $35 per year.
At the risk of sounding like a spoiled rich kid, it's interesting but not worth the effort.
hs
#20
Remember, to take advantage of higher octane fuels, which by nature have higher burn points (or is it called flash or something else ), you have to change the ECU programming (maybe plugs too ). Otherwise the stock programming cannot adjust timing, etc. far enough, resulting in not all of the fuel combusting...which means less power. MINI specs out the range of octane the stock programming is good for. It something like from 91 to 97 or so for the MCS.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
R50/53 R53 Chrono Pack - gauge?
missinmyjeep
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
5
08-22-2015 07:13 PM
dchang0
Stock Problems/Issues
2
08-10-2015 03:37 PM