Drivetrain In development: Helix front mount stepped-core
#1
In development: Helix front mount stepped-core
Over the last several months we have developed a new concept in intercooling for BMW applications, and decided to apply it to our R56 MINI. It utilizes dual-thickness cores to maximize both frontal area as well as core thickness. The end tanks are cast, and as you can see in the design pics, encompass both cores. The idea is to be able to install the intercooler without cutting or other permanent modifications, and fully utilize the space at the front of the car. The test prototype is being assembled as we speak and we expect to see it here soon.
Here's a side shot:
And here's a 3/4 view from the rear:
Here's a side shot:
And here's a 3/4 view from the rear:
#2
#4
What are the advantages of the thicker lower part? I don't have a clear idea of the R56 engine bay as I have an R50 but my guess is that it would go further toward the centre of the engine bay, wouldn't this push that section too near to the engine itself, thus in an hot area?
It's no closer to the engine than stock.
#5
Yeah, I understood that from heyduard's post.
#7
Trending Topics
#9
Over the last several months we have developed a new concept in intercooling for BMW applications, and decided to apply it to our R56 MINI. It utilizes dual-thickness cores to maximize both frontal area as well as core thickness. The end tanks are cast, and as you can see in the design pics, encompass both cores. The idea is to be able to install the intercooler without cutting or other permanent modifications, and fully utilize the space at the front of the car. The test prototype is being assembled as we speak and we expect to see it here soon.
Here's a side shot:
And here's a 3/4 view from the rear:
Here's a side shot:
And here's a 3/4 view from the rear:
What about mounting points. Will this IC be secured at OEM points ?.
#10
This style has been done already by RMS in Germany. However it doesn't use factory mounting parts and thus requires drilling to the front crash beam to secure the upper edge of IC.
#11
#16
You may have an efficiency issue here. The lower core closest to your outlets will have the greatest resistance to air flow through the core.
A medium thickness core would have a higher efficiency I believe.
A medium thickness core would have a higher efficiency I believe.
Over the last several months we have developed a new concept in intercooling for BMW applications, and decided to apply it to our R56 MINI. It utilizes dual-thickness cores to maximize both frontal area as well as core thickness. The end tanks are cast, and as you can see in the design pics, encompass both cores. The idea is to be able to install the intercooler without cutting or other permanent modifications, and fully utilize the space at the front of the car. The test prototype is being assembled as we speak and we expect to see it here soon.
Here's a side shot:
And here's a 3/4 view from the rear:
Here's a side shot:
And here's a 3/4 view from the rear:
#17
I helped Eric design this intercooler, the entire core uses the same internal fin count so it will have the same resistance through the entire core. this design was done in order to maximize the available area in the front of the car, we streamlined every aspect of the cast endtanks to get air to flow as best we could. Once we recieve the final prototype we will run it through a battery of tests and dynos you guys will get plenty of data
#18
I'm not sure where that speculation comes from. That has not been the case with the BMW intercoolers. Testing tells all.
#19
Not trying to put the design down. Just something to keep in mind. The speculation comes from years of being an engineer. It is my job to optimize designs everyday.
#20