When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I took mine to the track firday night and ran a 14.92@94 w/ a 2.3 60ft. This is just with this intake and a 2.5in catback (w/ chambered resonator and magnaflow muffler). Compare it to stock when I ran a 15.15.
I took mine to the track firday night and ran a 14.92@94 w/ a 2.3 60ft. This is just with this intake and a 2.5in catback (w/ chambered resonator and magnaflow muffler). Compare it to stock when I ran a 15.15.
did you run it 3 or 4 times with that same quarter mile time, give or take .02-.03 seconds? if not that difference could be completely in how you launched/drove your car,even weather conditions can give you a time split like that.... need more data
I took mine to the track firday night and ran a 14.92@94 w/ a 2.3 60ft. This is just with this intake and a 2.5in catback (w/ chambered resonator and magnaflow muffler). Compare it to stock when I ran a 15.15.
I took mine to the track firday night and ran a 14.92@94 w/ a 2.3 60ft. This is just with this intake and a 2.5in catback (w/ chambered resonator and magnaflow muffler). Compare it to stock when I ran a 15.15.
A difference in trap speeds would show gains better than your times. Too many variables to say that the intake+exhaust produced a 14.9 vs a 15.1.
Its amazing how these guys get their ***** busted for not posting numbers and then when they do post they get them busted all over again. For the most part it is the same small contingent of posters with a common denominator which makes one wonder about the motive or perhaps agenda. In any event the one thing we know is that you dyno 10 minis and you will get a wide variety of results. If the next guy with a r-56 does the same test the the chances are of the exact same numbers are remote indeed. They might even be better .
waves to Randy/maxmini/M7/trackster. amazing, you guys are allowed to use an alter ego to shill your own products. classy move, this.
waves to Randy/maxmini/M7/trackster. amazing, you guys are allowed to use an alter ego to shill your own products. classy move, this.
I've researched this and it isn't Randy. Trackster is another user who does tuning in SoCal apparently. My understanding is that M7 uses his facilities and services from time to time so posting from the same computer is certainly possible.
I've researched this and it isn't Randy. Trackster is another user who does tuning in SoCal apparently. My understanding is that M7 uses his facilities and services from time to time so posting from the same computer is certainly possible.
Mark
thanks Mark. Interesting info and certainly sheds light on trackster's 'defense' of M7 in this and other threads.
I've researched this and it isn't Randy. Trackster is another user who does tuning in SoCal apparently. My understanding is that M7 uses his facilities and services from time to time so posting from the same computer is certainly possible.
Mark
Wow Mark, does that make him a shill or just a fan boy. You've hammered me here publicly for talking about RMW and Voltage. So I will be very interested in how you handle the fact that Trackster and M7 work together and yet Trackster acts as though he is just, "some guy".
Wow Mark, does that make him a shill or just a fan boy. You've hammered me here publicly for talking about RMW and Voltage. So I will be very interested in how you handle the fact that Trackster and M7 work together and yet Trackster acts as though he is just, "some guy".
Longboard
I'm still looking into this but what I can say is that his overall volume of posting relative to M7 does not yet compare to your posting related to RMW.