Drivetrain Big turbo upgrade with the Garrett GT28RS!
#26
i had my 09' jcw dyno'd at 233whp with just the intake and alta FMIC i just got the riss racing catless DP a few months ago had it installed and havent had it dyno'd yet but it pulls like a bat out of hell. i think a tune and Methanol is all these cars need with suporting pluming work.
Mustang dyno ?
#30
What was the factor,outside temp,humidity? but still sounds much higher than my dynojet.
Testing on a dynojet with a stock jcw resulted in 188whp and with intercooler picked up 0 whp.(both cold pulls)
A dos cai picked up 8 whp
On a 79 degree day with humidity 46% using a sae factor of 0.98 my car made 228 whp and 225 wtq with dos cai ,meth, forge intercooler, riss catless downpipe and a riss free flow 2.5 exhaust.
Testing on a dynojet with a stock jcw resulted in 188whp and with intercooler picked up 0 whp.(both cold pulls)
A dos cai picked up 8 whp
On a 79 degree day with humidity 46% using a sae factor of 0.98 my car made 228 whp and 225 wtq with dos cai ,meth, forge intercooler, riss catless downpipe and a riss free flow 2.5 exhaust.
#31
#32
from the numbers I am guessing your pull was on a mustang dyno because when I did a pull on a mustang my whp was up by 40.
#34
#40
Jan has tried to tune my car and is now working on a specifictune for a Jcw,hope it is ready by then.
The main thing with a JCW is that the turbo is the limiting factor for building power,
can a jcw take more boost? maybe
does the Jcw run out of airflow beyond 6k rpms? yes
Macedo Motorsports /M2 Powerhouse plans to fabricate a sheetmetal intake manifold, stud the head,port and polish the intake and exhaust ports,trick valves with multiangle seats,gas flow the exhaust manifold, install higher lift cams with better springs and to go with a ballbearing ko4 .Should have all this done in the next month or 2 depending on the machineshops meeting their deadline.
The main thing with a JCW is that the turbo is the limiting factor for building power,
can a jcw take more boost? maybe
does the Jcw run out of airflow beyond 6k rpms? yes
Macedo Motorsports /M2 Powerhouse plans to fabricate a sheetmetal intake manifold, stud the head,port and polish the intake and exhaust ports,trick valves with multiangle seats,gas flow the exhaust manifold, install higher lift cams with better springs and to go with a ballbearing ko4 .Should have all this done in the next month or 2 depending on the machineshops meeting their deadline.
Last edited by JamesHunt; 01-23-2010 at 11:34 AM.
#45
This thread is SO off topic lol. oh well. I see you took your RR exhaust off James. I'm thinking about changing out the exhaust and leaving the downpipe on. Does M2 Powerhouse have a website with thier exhaust for sale on it? I'm thinking about selling this thing and gettng something a little less drone happy.
#46
I have seen some internet banter on this site recently in which, to substantiate an arguement, Mustangs were accused of reading high, which is nonsense. They read as high or as low as you set them.
When we started dynoing MINIs in 2001 (that's right we had one here before they were on sale in the US), we intentionally calibrated our Mustang MD-250 conservatively, so that people wouldn't call our numbers into question. We kept our calibration and correction factor consistent over the years, despite showing lower numbers than other tuners for similar products. Search the archives, you'll see our dyno referred to as the 'heartbreaker'. Again, it's not the dyno, it's how you calibrate, and set the correction factors.
#47
Mustang dynos don't read any higher than any other brand of dynos: they read what you caibrate them to read. If you paid somebody to run your car on a Mustang, and it read 40 over where it should have been, you should go get your money back.
I have seen some internet banter on this site recently in which, to substantiate an arguement, Mustangs were accused of reading high, which is nonsense. They read as high or as low as you set them.
When we started dynoing MINIs in 2001 (that's right we had one here before they were on sale in the US), we intentionally calibrated our Mustang MD-250 conservatively, so that people wouldn't call our numbers into question. We kept our calibration and correction factor consistent over the years, despite showing lower numbers than other tuners for similar products. Search the archives, you'll see our dyno referred to as the 'heartbreaker'. Again, it's not the dyno, it's how you calibrate, and set the correction factors.
I have seen some internet banter on this site recently in which, to substantiate an arguement, Mustangs were accused of reading high, which is nonsense. They read as high or as low as you set them.
When we started dynoing MINIs in 2001 (that's right we had one here before they were on sale in the US), we intentionally calibrated our Mustang MD-250 conservatively, so that people wouldn't call our numbers into question. We kept our calibration and correction factor consistent over the years, despite showing lower numbers than other tuners for similar products. Search the archives, you'll see our dyno referred to as the 'heartbreaker'. Again, it's not the dyno, it's how you calibrate, and set the correction factors.
I thank you and the mini/bmw world should be grateful that helix,Rmw and a couple of other tuners do not work the dyno#s to show false numbers .I wish more tuners and dyno operators would live by the same code
#50