Drivetrain Recirculation (DV/BOV) valve.
#126
#127
#130
I am pretty sure he meant the R56 in general.
Just like the R53 and most factory spec internals of other manufacture's engines, the R56 will need upgraded internals to handle added boost past a certain point. Unfortunatly that threshold is not that high on the MCS and only marginally better on the JCW.
Don't get me wrong with a good tune the engine should be able to run fine boosting around 18-20 psi and make decent power, but I think that's about the limit for now. With a larger turbo it would probably be less.
Just keep in mind that MINI used the current JCW turbo on the 10.5 compression ratio MCS when developing the JCW. They were blowing engines and have complete control of the ECU and the full ability to tune it.
Although with the Alta AP or the Dimsport we have some flexibility and can tune outside the regulations of CARB, EPA, ect., we still do not have full control of the ECU and can only do so much before the engine just mechanicly fails.
#131
No, my boost cuts were never associated with misfires.
Everyone.
^^what he said!
Keep in mind I have been running various tunes and high boost for over 2 years now. Most people have only recently begun running high boost, thanks to the AcccesPort. You will start to see the weaknesses in these motors as more of those people put miles on. And as far as doing turbo swaps....I'd say forget it unless you want to touch the internals. I'm still running a JCW turbo, and will not get rid of it....but I do want to run a few less psi this time around. I'll take 10-15 less whp in exchange for longevity....
Everyone.
I am pretty sure he meant the R56 in general.
Just like the R53 and most factory spec internals of other manufacture's engines, the R56 will need upgraded internals to handle added boost past a certain point. Unfortunatly that threshold is not that high on the MCS and only marginally better on the JCW.
Don't get me wrong with a good tune the engine should be able to run fine boosting around 18-20 psi and make decent power, but I think that's about the limit for now. With a larger turbo it would probably be less.
Just keep in mind that MINI used the current JCW turbo on the 10.5 compression ratio MCS when developing the JCW. They were blowing engines and have complete control of the ECU and the full ability to tune it.
Although with the Alta AP or the Dimsport we have some flexibility and can tune outside the regulations of CARB, EPA, ect., we still do not have full control of the ECU and can only do so much before the engine just mechanicly fails.
Just like the R53 and most factory spec internals of other manufacture's engines, the R56 will need upgraded internals to handle added boost past a certain point. Unfortunatly that threshold is not that high on the MCS and only marginally better on the JCW.
Don't get me wrong with a good tune the engine should be able to run fine boosting around 18-20 psi and make decent power, but I think that's about the limit for now. With a larger turbo it would probably be less.
Just keep in mind that MINI used the current JCW turbo on the 10.5 compression ratio MCS when developing the JCW. They were blowing engines and have complete control of the ECU and the full ability to tune it.
Although with the Alta AP or the Dimsport we have some flexibility and can tune outside the regulations of CARB, EPA, ect., we still do not have full control of the ECU and can only do so much before the engine just mechanicly fails.
Keep in mind I have been running various tunes and high boost for over 2 years now. Most people have only recently begun running high boost, thanks to the AcccesPort. You will start to see the weaknesses in these motors as more of those people put miles on. And as far as doing turbo swaps....I'd say forget it unless you want to touch the internals. I'm still running a JCW turbo, and will not get rid of it....but I do want to run a few less psi this time around. I'll take 10-15 less whp in exchange for longevity....
Last edited by ThumperMCS; 05-09-2011 at 12:41 AM.
#132
No, my boost cuts were never associated with misfires.
Keep in mind I have been running various tunes and high boost for over 2 years now. Most people have only recently begun running high boost, thanks to the AcccesPort. You will start to see the weaknesses in these motors as more of those people put miles on. And as far as doing turbo swaps....I'd say forget it unless you want to touch the internals. I'm still running a JCW turbo, and will not get rid of it....but I do want to run a few less psi this time around. I'll take 10-15 less whp in exchange for longevity....
Keep in mind I have been running various tunes and high boost for over 2 years now. Most people have only recently begun running high boost, thanks to the AcccesPort. You will start to see the weaknesses in these motors as more of those people put miles on. And as far as doing turbo swaps....I'd say forget it unless you want to touch the internals. I'm still running a JCW turbo, and will not get rid of it....but I do want to run a few less psi this time around. I'll take 10-15 less whp in exchange for longevity....
Also, one more question: Is the JCW turbo a direct bolt-on for any R56?
#133
Maybe you can help me out. Our setups are similar (except my exhaust is a bit more restrictive than yours). I have been overboosting (to almost 23psi, then it often dumps) and Jan says it is not a result of the Stage One AP tune which he dyno-tweaked a month or so ago. I also want to bring the boost down under 20. Do you think I have wastegate problems? Diverter valve issues? I'm not as expert as I would like to be on the internals of turbos, but I do know that 22+psi scares the heck out of me.
Also, one more question: Is the JCW turbo a direct bolt-on for any R56?
Also, one more question: Is the JCW turbo a direct bolt-on for any R56?
Get the boost down...should help. But depending on what he tweaks you might still get spikes that reach 22.
And yes, the JCW turbo is a direct bolt on and its a great way to go if you want more power
#136
GKP, this is a very slippery slope for a track oriented car. Get your boost and HP down otherwise you will be limping home or breaking stuff and towing it home.
As you know, I am already having tons of issues without too much over boosting, mostly from track stress. I know eventually I will have to buy a real track oriented car such as a cayman.
As you know, I am already having tons of issues without too much over boosting, mostly from track stress. I know eventually I will have to buy a real track oriented car such as a cayman.
#138
I was going to go full custom with Jan, and try to do a 1.8L with it....but its my only car and did not have the time to not have a car for a month or so, I went with another stock motor.
Will be installing a meth kit shortly to help keep things cool and safe in there though...
Will be installing a meth kit shortly to help keep things cool and safe in there though...
#139
I was going to go full custom with Jan, and try to do a 1.8L with it....but its my only car and did not have the time to not have a car for a month or so, I went with another stock motor.
Will be installing a meth kit shortly to help keep things cool and safe in there though...
Will be installing a meth kit shortly to help keep things cool and safe in there though...
#140
#141
Right behind you with an aqua mist setup
I was going to go full custom with Jan, and try to do a 1.8L with it....but its my only car and did not have the time to not have a car for a month or so, I went with another stock motor.
Will be installing a meth kit shortly to help keep things cool and safe in there though...
Will be installing a meth kit shortly to help keep things cool and safe in there though...
#142
#143
And as far as the 2nd question......I prefer not to answer
#144
#146
GKP, this is a very slippery slope for a track oriented car. Get your boost and HP down otherwise you will be limping home or breaking stuff and towing it home.
As you know, I am already having tons of issues without too much over boosting, mostly from track stress. I know eventually I will have to buy a real track oriented car such as a cayman.
As you know, I am already having tons of issues without too much over boosting, mostly from track stress. I know eventually I will have to buy a real track oriented car such as a cayman.
#147
Tested the differences. Definitely a difference in smoothness but i registered a whopping 1.2psi drop in 3 wot max boost. The loss i think will also be variable to the amount of boost being run, more pressure= more loss and vice versa.
It is not air tight unfortunately. Now like CZAR said before thought the amount of air lost is going to be minimal. I am on the go fast side of things so any air lost for me is too much for my personal mission.
Area in red is where air leaks from. Like i said the size of the holes don't matter as they are there to allow are to escape the internals. The internal sealing ring around the plunger is just not tight. I wonder if any vw audi guys have a remedy for this
Like i said before the design is good, i'm sure it would definitely smooth things out as the transfer of air is smooth instead of a burst.
Just because is not a tight seal does not mean its not a good mod. if smoothness is what your looking for then get it for sure.
VW and audi guys are loosing boost because of this, i even tried to use a similar like diaphram but it causes too much resistance as the cover for the innards has slim clearance.
It is not air tight unfortunately. Now like CZAR said before thought the amount of air lost is going to be minimal. I am on the go fast side of things so any air lost for me is too much for my personal mission.
Area in red is where air leaks from. Like i said the size of the holes don't matter as they are there to allow are to escape the internals. The internal sealing ring around the plunger is just not tight. I wonder if any vw audi guys have a remedy for this
Like i said before the design is good, i'm sure it would definitely smooth things out as the transfer of air is smooth instead of a burst.
Just because is not a tight seal does not mean its not a good mod. if smoothness is what your looking for then get it for sure.
VW and audi guys are loosing boost because of this, i even tried to use a similar like diaphram but it causes too much resistance as the cover for the innards has slim clearance.
Solving this issue is as easy as istalling a spacer between the DV and the turbo.
Mini DV Valve: 17mm
VAG DV Valve: 21mm
So a 4 mm spacer keeps the piston on the VAG DV fully closed, I did it myself and is a win win situation, because is BY FAR much more better DV than the oem if you run more than 20 psi as I do.
#149
Sorry but no.
First, English is not my primary language, so, forgive me if I make mistakes, I will try to explain myself as clear as possible.
The valve, with the piston in his relaxed normal position doesn't leak.
Pressurized air travels from the holes in the top of the piston to the bottom of the piston generating a back pressure that keep the valve and piston sealed.
Is not the spring that keeps the valve sealed, it is the bakpressure, that's the purpose of the holes, that's why holes in the VAG valve are bigger than the little ones in the PSA/Mini valve (apart from a much better design and the remove of the diafragm).
The VAG Valve measure from top to bottom 21 mm, PSA/Mini measure 17 mm
This 4 mm difference are the ones that makes the VAG valve leak, because the valve installed straight to the turbo case keeps the piston 4 mm back from his relaxed and sealed position.
Both valves were designed to be installed keeping the distance from top to bottom. If you push the piston 4 mm and leave it this way, valve keeps leaking from the bottom of the piston, and air travels trough the holes of the second crown/ring.
Measure the distance from the bottom of the hole on the turbo to the top, and you will see that it is 17 mm, put the VAG valve into it and you will see that you have to push it a little to make it fit, you are compressing the piston the 4 mm difference. From that's 4 mm is were the pressurized air travels and leak.
So, if you put a custom made spacer that makes the VAG valve fits the way is meant to be, it works perfect and much better than the oem one.
I tell you this because I learned the hard way trying to make the oem valve works in my big turbo project, I tried many different springs, some works better than others, but in the end, none of them works better than the VAG valve installed the right way.
https://www.northamericanmotoring.co...argentina.html
#150
Its actually an electronic solenoid which keeps the valve open or closed, the spring assists in the returning of the valve. If you remove the valve and blow on it you will see the punger can not make an air tight seal against the tapered seal ring. Take it out and test it. air doesnt travel through the holes, the holes are to remove air resistance during the action of opening and closing. You wont know their is a leak until you test it as by ecu if there is an internal leak the ecu will leave the waste gate closed to achieve target boost. The plunger does not make an air tight seal against the tapered ring becaue the ring isnt a true circle, on top of the there is no rubber seal around the piston, it cannot be pressure tight. the plunger doesnt actually go in the bypass hole it sits against the hole lip. The factory valve has a tapered rubber seal which fits into a groove on the compressor housing.
Sorry but no.
First, English is not my primary language, so, forgive me if I make mistakes, I will try to explain myself as clear as possible.
The valve, with the piston in his relaxed normal position doesn't leak.
Pressurized air travels from the holes in the top of the piston to the bottom of the piston generating a back pressure that keep the valve and piston sealed.
Is not the spring that keeps the valve sealed, it is the bakpressure, that's the purpose of the holes, that's why holes in the VAG valve are bigger than the little ones in the PSA/Mini valve (apart from a much better design and the remove of the diafragm).
The VAG Valve measure from top to bottom 21 mm, PSA/Mini measure 17 mm
This 4 mm difference are the ones that makes the VAG valve leak, because the valve installed straight to the turbo case keeps the piston 4 mm back from his relaxed and sealed position.
Both valves were designed to be installed keeping the distance from top to bottom. If you push the piston 4 mm and leave it this way, valve keeps leaking from the bottom of the piston, and air travels trough the holes of the second crown/ring.
Measure the distance from the bottom of the hole on the turbo to the top, and you will see that it is 17 mm, put the VAG valve into it and you will see that you have to push it a little to make it fit, you are compressing the piston the 4 mm difference. From that's 4 mm is were the pressurized air travels and leak.
So, if you put a custom made spacer that makes the VAG valve fits the way is meant to be, it works perfect and much better than the oem one.
I tell you this because I learned the hard way trying to make the oem valve works in my big turbo project, I tried many different springs, some works better than others, but in the end, none of them works better than the VAG valve installed the right way.
https://www.northamericanmotoring.co...argentina.html
First, English is not my primary language, so, forgive me if I make mistakes, I will try to explain myself as clear as possible.
The valve, with the piston in his relaxed normal position doesn't leak.
Pressurized air travels from the holes in the top of the piston to the bottom of the piston generating a back pressure that keep the valve and piston sealed.
Is not the spring that keeps the valve sealed, it is the bakpressure, that's the purpose of the holes, that's why holes in the VAG valve are bigger than the little ones in the PSA/Mini valve (apart from a much better design and the remove of the diafragm).
The VAG Valve measure from top to bottom 21 mm, PSA/Mini measure 17 mm
This 4 mm difference are the ones that makes the VAG valve leak, because the valve installed straight to the turbo case keeps the piston 4 mm back from his relaxed and sealed position.
Both valves were designed to be installed keeping the distance from top to bottom. If you push the piston 4 mm and leave it this way, valve keeps leaking from the bottom of the piston, and air travels trough the holes of the second crown/ring.
Measure the distance from the bottom of the hole on the turbo to the top, and you will see that it is 17 mm, put the VAG valve into it and you will see that you have to push it a little to make it fit, you are compressing the piston the 4 mm difference. From that's 4 mm is were the pressurized air travels and leak.
So, if you put a custom made spacer that makes the VAG valve fits the way is meant to be, it works perfect and much better than the oem one.
I tell you this because I learned the hard way trying to make the oem valve works in my big turbo project, I tried many different springs, some works better than others, but in the end, none of them works better than the VAG valve installed the right way.
https://www.northamericanmotoring.co...argentina.html
Last edited by Bigprfed22; 09-28-2012 at 12:15 PM.