When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
That's the first time I've seen the CP piston and it does seem odd. I believe the CP piston was based off the MCS 10.4:1 piston and was brought down to 9.5:1. Possible they assumed it was a normal piston and simply left the cup out. I'm not sure who was involved in the design, I just know it was available after Hubie had the rods spec'd. The JE pistons Hubie spec'd out have the corrected cup for the DI.
That's what I'm talking about! Very shallow bowl but essentially a copy of the Mahle piston crown.
What kind of numbers have the ABF guys been seeing with these pistons in higher boost applications?
The only set I know of in use is in mrrjm car and I've yet to see numbers from his car. Hubie may have sold more, but I can't be certain. TBH they should be just as reliable as the ones he had made for the R53 that saw 600+ whp.
The CP piston is probably decent strength wise and very comparable to the JE, but there is the matter of that missing cup.
The CP piston is probably decent strength wise and very comparable to the JE, but there is the matter of that missing cup.
Have to agree ^^^ but without the wall guide, there is no way to control the injected fuel, nor to place the fuel charge mix in the precise position of the pent roof chamber, and the central position of the piston crown, to optimise the ignition charge!
Furthermore without the exhaust valve relief step, you are going to encounter valve/piston contact, from what I can see from your image of the pistons you have selected, unless the centre – centre height has been re-calculated to take into consideration of the known valve lift (9.5mm) and subsequently engineered into the piston/connecting rod package.
But I doubt this is the case, and those pistons in the image are wrong, for the intended use.
The intakes reliefs are very visible on the new pistons. We decided to choose a lower compression piston, there for the dish is larger. That is how lower compression is accomplished, by a deeper "dished" piston. Since the original exhaust valve reliefs were very small to start with, the additional new deeper cut dish removes the need/sign of the exhaust relief. This missing exhaust reliefs are very common with lower compression pistons and exactly signifies the piston is indeed lower compression as spec'd.
The intakes reliefs are very visible on the new pistons. We decided to choose a lower compression piston, there for the dish is larger. That is how lower compression is accomplished, by a deeper "dished" piston. Since the original exhaust valve reliefs were very small to start with, the additional new deeper cut dish removes the need/sign of the exhaust relief. This missing exhaust reliefs are very common with lower compression pistons and exactly signifies the piston is indeed lower compression as spec'd.
Thank you for your explanation, however a few of us, are quite familiar with the concept, so you've selected dished crowns a static CR of 9.5:1 what is your solution to controlling the air/fuel tumbling mix, from not having a combustion wall guide ? And with a lower than desirable volume charge pressure, how will that effect the ignition control ?
This is one of the most interesting threads I've read in a long time. I'm curious though about all the failures some of you have experienced with your,stage three tunes. I'm assuming stage three entails the upgrading the fmic, exhaust/intake and engine tune. This has me a little nervous as these are all the same mods that I've performed on my 2007 MCS.
How did u all perform these upgrades without upgrading the fuel delivery systems (i.e. injectors, high pressure pump, etc...).
Thanks for posting the details on your build. Will be watching with great anticipation!
I agree! This has to be the best thread in a long time. I'm very interested in the bottom line cost to rebuild to this level. I was just telling a friend this week that it would be fun to build a high HP and reliable Mini engine.
Can't wait for the updates.
Please take that stupid noise maker off your firewall before you reinstall the engine. Other than that I hate that your engine blew but, I am glad to see how you are improving things under the hood.
What's the noise maker and which part of the firewall is it? Thx.
Yeah but, you destroke it and rev it up higher means more boost. Yes less tq though.
destroking means having a one off crank built for build then you need to
come up with new valvetrain components and cylinder head mods to handle the higher rpm.
Sorry haven't update you guys for a while. I just got the car back. The car feels strong for not running any tune. Once I break in the motor will upload the stage 4 tune. Will dyno the car and post results.
Im also about to start to rebuilt my engine and I have a quick question... Would it be bad to just change the pistons and not the rods? From what I have read, the pistons are the weak point not the rods.
Yes that is correct. You can just change the pistons and not the rods.
Originally Posted by minikr56
Im also about to start to rebuilt my engine and I have a quick question... Would it be bad to just change the pistons and not the rods? From what I have read, the pistons are the weak point not the rods.