Drivetrain Intercoolers: Helix or TyrolSport or Alta?
#26
Yes sure, I don't mind explaining my reasoning.
I'm sure their FMIC is okay, but I refuse to buy any of their products as I hear their intakes are issues down the road(don't get mad I said it, read threads on here and MINI2), I bought Alta endlinks that were completely junk in my opinion, and also their boost tubes are so cheap they tear and wear very quickly compared to Samco and Forge. Those are just a few of my points. But again, I will stick with other products that do the job better over a period of time.
But again I'm sure their FMIC at Alta is pretty decent, at least it might be the only good thing they have going for them right now, IMO(don't get mad that I stated my reasons, everyone has their own experience and opinions to justify their reasoning behind it).
I'm sure their FMIC is okay, but I refuse to buy any of their products as I hear their intakes are issues down the road(don't get mad I said it, read threads on here and MINI2), I bought Alta endlinks that were completely junk in my opinion, and also their boost tubes are so cheap they tear and wear very quickly compared to Samco and Forge. Those are just a few of my points. But again, I will stick with other products that do the job better over a period of time.
But again I'm sure their FMIC at Alta is pretty decent, at least it might be the only good thing they have going for them right now, IMO(don't get mad that I stated my reasons, everyone has their own experience and opinions to justify their reasoning behind it).
#27
2nd Gear
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Clarsville TN
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not mad at all I use NM for my boost tubes and various other company's for my other parts as my FMIC is the only part I have from them I was just curious, I've heard a lot of contradicting things about them. All in all just like to hear other people's opinions and do as much research as possible before I decide on a part
Sent from my iPhone using NAMotoring
Sent from my iPhone using NAMotoring
#28
minimech, if I were you, stay away and beware of the products. Stick with NM, Forge, Samco, Helix, Tyrolsport, Way, Detroit Tuned, and so on. They actually put good products on their shelves and won't wear and tear your pockets.
What FMIC do you have right now? Or are you in the process of purchasing one?
What FMIC do you have right now? Or are you in the process of purchasing one?
#29
Can't decide. Data seems to be the same. I'm getting an intercooler so that I can get a stage 2 tune by NM Eng. Not considering Forge because they basically have the same design that Helix has and I consider the Helix one superior. Also wondering why no one really mentions the TyrolSport intercooler...seems like a unique design although it costs almost double but other than that can't figure out why it's so uncommon. The ALTA one looks ok but don't like the idea of trimming but if its a quality intercooler, then why not? Wondering about the quality of the ALTA as opposed to the Helix.
In other words, help me pick one. I just want feedback negative or positive. I will probably buy the one that's most recommended. Btw I've done research and what seems more realistic is the Helix or Alta. i still want feedback on the TyrolSport. Quality wise what am I looking at?
In other words, help me pick one. I just want feedback negative or positive. I will probably buy the one that's most recommended. Btw I've done research and what seems more realistic is the Helix or Alta. i still want feedback on the TyrolSport. Quality wise what am I looking at?
I'm curious to know why you consider the Helix to be the superior IC over the Forge when you say they have similar designs? I personally planned on buying the Forge IC as I consider them a very reputable company (taking nothing from Helix as they are as well) and there are many people that are happy with the Forge, but curious to hear your viewpoint.
#30
#34
They did copy our design, but not all of the features that we have put into the Helix stepped core intercooler: cast end tanks, bull-nosed bars (both inside the tanks and across the face) and higher, offset fin density. These features are key to better flow and better cooling. Oh, and the Helix has much greater thermal mass.
#35
AgBullet, I agree with Rob, Forge is high quality and a reputable company and so is Helix...it's just the same design and I don't want to take anything away from forge. I, too have heard contradicting statements about Alta. It seems they are hit or miss with their products, I don't like that. To answer your question, I truthfully just trust Helix more because of their willingness to know their consumers. They seem to be more interested, which is nice once in a while Forge is a good company as well and I would still buy a product for them but not in this case. Hope that helps
#37
I've been wondering about Alta's recirculating valve. A couple of years ago I tried the Forge and didn't like it. Too much surge-y "da da da da" noises. I DO like the idea that Alta's is mechanically actuated.
#40
I'm inclined to try out Evolve's FMIC. From what I've read on another forum, Evolve's recovery time was waaaaay better than the Forge FMIC. That alone entices me. Tyrol is insane, but it takes up a space in the upper grill where I want to install an oil cooler, so Evolve has my vote so far.
#41
I'm inclined to try out Evolve's FMIC. From what I've read on another forum, Evolve's recovery time was waaaaay better than the Forge FMIC. That alone entices me. Tyrol is insane, but it takes up a space in the upper grill where I want to install an oil cooler, so Evolve has my vote so far.
Unless you have some very unusual, specific needs for your R56 intercooler, you're much better off using a cooler that balances all aspects of charge cooling. That is why we have employed the stepped design which gives both good core thickness (better thermal mass) as well as frontal area (quicker recovery rate). We also feature bull-nosed bars, which increase flow across the face and through the core (better efficiency and less pressure drop), and high fin density (greatest IAT drop). Others have copied certain aspects of our coolers, but none have copied all.
Last edited by Helix13mini; 04-24-2013 at 11:08 AM.
#45
It may be that an intercooler has a good recovery rate, but that doesn't make it a good intercooler. You can manufacture an intercooler with very low thermal mass, and very little core thickness to have a quick recovery rate. If you have a reason for quick recovery rate (like the stock R53 intercooler), that's great, but there are costs. When you do so, you inherently compromise other desirable effects of a good intercooler, like pressure drop, thermal mass, efficiency and temperature drop.
Unless you have some very unusual, specific needs for your R56 intercooler, you're much better off using a cooler that balances all aspects of charge cooling. That is why we have employed the stepped design which gives both good core thickness (better thermal mass) as well as frontal area (quicker recovery rate). We also feature bull-nosed bars, which increase flow across the face and through the core (better efficiency and less pressure drop), and high fin density (greatest IAT drop). Others have copied certain aspects of our coolers, but none have copied all.
Unless you have some very unusual, specific needs for your R56 intercooler, you're much better off using a cooler that balances all aspects of charge cooling. That is why we have employed the stepped design which gives both good core thickness (better thermal mass) as well as frontal area (quicker recovery rate). We also feature bull-nosed bars, which increase flow across the face and through the core (better efficiency and less pressure drop), and high fin density (greatest IAT drop). Others have copied certain aspects of our coolers, but none have copied all.
#48
#50