Drivetrain Finally Internals!
#52
Great video. Car sounds great at speed too. "I did it...1:59" celebration. Yeah!
Anyway, do you have any idea what your boost runs? I probably won't go to a dyno, and some comments here suggest the threshold for safe internals is the whp, but I only have access to the OBD apps that give calculated boost pressure.
I have both the Stage 1 and Stage 2 maps. And the apps says (I'm sure it would be more accurate with a mechanical gauge though) the Stage 1 is between around 11-13 psi and the Stage 2 is around 17-18 psi.
After re-reading this thread, I've flashed back in the Stage 1.
Anyway, do you have any idea what your boost runs? I probably won't go to a dyno, and some comments here suggest the threshold for safe internals is the whp, but I only have access to the OBD apps that give calculated boost pressure.
I have both the Stage 1 and Stage 2 maps. And the apps says (I'm sure it would be more accurate with a mechanical gauge though) the Stage 1 is between around 11-13 psi and the Stage 2 is around 17-18 psi.
After re-reading this thread, I've flashed back in the Stage 1.
#53
The following users liked this post:
Warren2185 (01-12-2020)
#54
Great video. Car sounds great at speed too. "I did it...1:59" celebration. Yeah!
Anyway, do you have any idea what your boost runs? I probably won't go to a dyno, and some comments here suggest the threshold for safe internals is the whp, but I only have access to the OBD apps that give calculated boost pressure.
I have both the Stage 1 and Stage 2 maps. And the apps says (I'm sure it would be more accurate with a mechanical gauge though) the Stage 1 is between around 11-13 psi and the Stage 2 is around 17-18 psi.
After re-reading this thread, I've flashed back in the Stage 1.
Anyway, do you have any idea what your boost runs? I probably won't go to a dyno, and some comments here suggest the threshold for safe internals is the whp, but I only have access to the OBD apps that give calculated boost pressure.
I have both the Stage 1 and Stage 2 maps. And the apps says (I'm sure it would be more accurate with a mechanical gauge though) the Stage 1 is between around 11-13 psi and the Stage 2 is around 17-18 psi.
After re-reading this thread, I've flashed back in the Stage 1.
Boost pressure should still be looked further into and should be the determining factor for threshold identification for safe internals. I did do some digging and looked into cases of failed internals versus the mods they did. Most other B48 piston failures (from other BMW vehicles) stems from irresponsible tunes to achieve those bigger whp numbers. Most of them did it by adding on the target boost without regards to what the internals can take.
The following users liked this post:
Warren2185 (01-13-2020)
#56
@Yupetc - can you expand on that? Are you seeing a pattern of exactly how much PSI has led to failures?
And do you know if these tunes are messing with the knock sensor as well? Thanks.
And do you know if these tunes are messing with the knock sensor as well? Thanks.
#57
Hi friends, thought I would jump in on the discussion concerning reliability with modded F56’s. I have a 2017 JCW that is approaching 50k with lots of mods and I have had very good luck with it. For the past 30k miles I have had a Dinan Elite, methanol injection, two different exhausts, and a K&N intake
#58
Luckily, I also can read Chinese language and I came across this link https://www.bilibili.com/read/cv881742/
BTW, I can read Chinese as well, but only in circumstances where the Google Translate button shows in the upper right corner..hehe.
#59
Thanks for the link. It's amazing all their effort and research to build new pistons, I'm guessing, just for the race shops, tuners and such. I mean, the people that wrote that write-up aren't BMW engine designers, right?
BTW, I can read Chinese as well, but only in circumstances where the Google Translate button shows in the upper right corner..hehe.
BTW, I can read Chinese as well, but only in circumstances where the Google Translate button shows in the upper right corner..hehe.
The following 2 users liked this post by Yupetc:
bratling (04-17-2020),
Warren2185 (01-13-2020)
#60
I installed the Dinan Elite first and the meth kit many months later. There is no extra tuning going on for the injection, just letting it spray in conjunction with boost to aide in combustion.
#63
Thanks for the link. It's amazing all their effort and research to build new pistons, I'm guessing, just for the race shops, tuners and such. I mean, the people that wrote that write-up aren't BMW engine designers, right?
BTW, I can read Chinese as well, but only in circumstances where the Google Translate button shows in the upper right corner..hehe.
BTW, I can read Chinese as well, but only in circumstances where the Google Translate button shows in the upper right corner..hehe.
anyway, read this, it’s fascinating stuff:
https://translate.google.com/transla...%2Fcv881742%2F
some excerpts:
N20 and B48 are both cast aluminum alloy cylinder block, non-iron cylinder liner, 0.3mm thick iron arc wire coating. The advantage of this type of cylinder body sprayed with iron coating by arc wire is that it is lightweight, but the side effect is the decrease in cylinder life and strength. Very many cases have proved this point. BMW uses the cylinder in the engine as a consumable. …
The B48's piston stroke is 94.6mm, which is much larger than the 90.1mm of the N20. By increasing the stroke, you can obtain greater low and medium speed torque and greater piston acceleration. May also have lower fuel consumption, but the swing angle of the connecting rod will also increase, and the impact and wear of the piston on the cylinder wall will follow increase. …
And, where the volume of the engine is limited, where does the longer piston stroke space come from? The overall height of the piston can only be reduced. What is the result of the reduction of the overall height of the piston? The thickness of the piston ring is reduced, and the thickness of the piston crown is reduced. …
The biggest hidden danger of the B48 is the same as the N20, which is all in the piston, and even more worrying than the N20! I have done a visual comparison of pistons in the previous part. …
Cracked B48 piston from a MINI. Originally from https://www.bilibili.com/read/mobile/881742
”Pistons have cracked in BMW MINI models using B48 engines online”…In general, B48 has better cylinder strength and more convenient maintenance design than N20. If the problem of the piston can be solved, this engine will perform better.
The B48's piston stroke is 94.6mm, which is much larger than the 90.1mm of the N20. By increasing the stroke, you can obtain greater low and medium speed torque and greater piston acceleration. May also have lower fuel consumption, but the swing angle of the connecting rod will also increase, and the impact and wear of the piston on the cylinder wall will follow increase. …
And, where the volume of the engine is limited, where does the longer piston stroke space come from? The overall height of the piston can only be reduced. What is the result of the reduction of the overall height of the piston? The thickness of the piston ring is reduced, and the thickness of the piston crown is reduced. …
Cracked B48 piston from a MINI. Originally from https://www.bilibili.com/read/mobile/881742
”Pistons have cracked in BMW MINI models using B48 engines online”
The following users liked this post:
Warren2185 (01-22-2020)
#64
Hi, i'm new to this forum and seeing this i would like to share my experience. Currently stage 2 ( f56 S ) it has the b48 engine. Now over 128 000km on the clock. Running 268WHP (300hp) and 410nm. I'm experiencing not a single problem. Car is running 21-22 psi on the stock motor.. trackdays etc..
Seems like the b46 engine is not as strong as the b48 i think.
Seems like the b46 engine is not as strong as the b48 i think.
The following users liked this post:
Warren2185 (01-23-2020)
#65
Hi ClubsportF56S, welcome to http://www.NorthAmericanMotoring.com! I think you'll find it to be a pretty welcoming place. We're full of strong opinions, though, so be prepared to stand your ground ;-)
Regarding the B46 being "not as strong" as the B48, that shouldn't be the case. The B46 is a lower-emissions variant of the B48. There is no difference in the pistons, rods, crankshaft, or cylinders. With the same parts, they would share the same mechanical weaknesses.
(The new 300hp JCW variants have stronger, forged pistons.)
Additional info over in this thread – see post #15 in particular.
Regarding the B46 being "not as strong" as the B48, that shouldn't be the case. The B46 is a lower-emissions variant of the B48. There is no difference in the pistons, rods, crankshaft, or cylinders. With the same parts, they would share the same mechanical weaknesses.
(The new 300hp JCW variants have stronger, forged pistons.)
Additional info over in this thread – see post #15 in particular.
The following users liked this post:
Warren2185 (01-23-2020)
#66
To lower the emissions, my first think is about a more lean combustion. Which has higher combustion temperatures. That could burn a piston, throw a rod in some cases. Isn't that what's happening to the engine's that already blew up here? Good thing check the EGT's when mapping. Here in Europe (belgium/germany) they say 300hp is safe. 300 is safe on the S and even 320 on the JCW due to the better compression ratio. Is this type of tuning avaiable in the US? Or do these engine break because of tricking the ecu? I've heard that the JCW's engine isn't stronger than the S. It just has a better compression ratio for more power. But the strenght is equally. The new jcw engine in the gp3 and in the new m135i is indeed stronger but it will max out sooner @ 350hp. Mine has the economical hp rate (163hp) for lower taxes. But after stage 2 it made 300.42hp and 409nm of torque. Not agrresive in low revs, just all mid and top range. It keeps going. At the moment it's still a pretty happy engine. After 6000km it uses. 0.25l of oil. But that's when i do the oil change, so no signs of engine wear.
#67
It's very hard to say what horsepower will the engine fail; but it's safe to say that the pistons and the rings are the weakest links. Yes, there are cases of tuning the B48 beyond 300hp (likely 250-260whp, some with methanol going above 300whp) without an issue. But I suspect that once we've taken the tune to that level, the life of the pistons will start to reduce. You may get lucky for a while till something gives up. These B38 and B48 engines are designed for driving fuel economy and to enhance production efficiency during manufacturing (by way of modularity, platform sharing), it's not designed to withstand the abuse that we're accustomed to putting on common BMW engines. It's my opinion after all this research on BMW's latest B-series engines, I'll say that the 6 cylinder versions are designed for performance, and the 4 cylinders are for fuel economy and slight power use. It just simply won't withstand the high performance tunes we're all looking to do. Unless, of course, we start to look for those performance forged internal upgrades, then we can play safely.
The following users liked this post:
bratling (04-17-2020)
#68
The B58 is a 50% bigger engine compared to the B48. If i do my math correctly they produce around 50% more power at the same tuning level ( downpipe, IC, map) and yes they do. They are around 480hp here at stage 2. The next level is turbo etc but the stock engine has the same bore and stroke as the b48. So it would be nice to know if you could use the pistons of the b58 in the b48.
The following users liked this post:
bratling (04-17-2020)
#69
The B58 is a 50% bigger engine compared to the B48. If i do my math correctly they produce around 50% more power at the same tuning level ( downpipe, IC, map) and yes they do. They are around 480hp here at stage 2. The next level is turbo etc but the stock engine has the same bore and stroke as the b48. So it would be nice to know if you could use the pistons of the b58 in the b48.
I've been wondering the same thing about B48 and B58 pistons being interchangeable. And so far from what I've collected, they are exactly the same dimensions, just don't know if the valve cut-outs of B58 would match those of B48. But in terms of bore/stroke between B48 and B58, they are all the same. Also if you search forged B58 pistons, you'll also come across those saying the pistons are also available for the B48 under the same catalog page.
#70
#71
The pistons are exactly the same between the JCW and the S, it's the head dome volume and deck height that sets the difference in compression. The dome volume is larger in the heads on JCW, the head-gasket is also 0.3mm thicker, making it a factor into the static compression ratio.
The larger dome value achieves two things:
1. To yield a lower compression ratio without needing to reconfigure the stroke and piston dimension. It will not affect the dynamic displacement (the cc's is the common term). This allows a higher boost with a larger safety predetonation window.
2. The enlarged dome size allows room for valve size and flow path design to be optimized better. Larger dome equates to higher static volume in the chamber, which draws in more air in the combustion chamber, and with VVL and VVT in place, it can maximize overall volumetric efficiency for combustion process.
Last edited by Yupetc; 01-30-2020 at 09:40 AM.
The following users liked this post:
bratling (02-01-2020)
#72
To lower the emissions, my first think is about a more lean combustion. Which has higher combustion temperatures. That could burn a piston, throw a rod in some cases. Isn't that what's happening to the engine's that already blew up here? Good thing check the EGT's when mapping.
Last edited by bratling; 02-01-2020 at 05:54 PM. Reason: clarified relationship between rich mix & temps
#73
The pistons are exactly the same between the JCW and the S, it's the head dome volume and deck height that sets the difference in compression. The dome volume is larger in the heads on JCW, the head-gasket is also 0.3mm thicker, making it a factor into the static compression ratio.
The larger dome value achieves two things:
1. To yield a lower compression ratio without needing to reconfigure the stroke and piston dimension. It will not affect the dynamic displacement (the cc's is the common term). This allows a higher boost with a larger safety predetonation window.
2. The enlarged dome size allows room for valve size and flow path design to be optimized better. Larger dome equates to higher static volume in the chamber, which draws in more air in the combustion chamber, and with VVL and VVT in place, it can maximize overall volumetric efficiency for combustion process.
The larger dome value achieves two things:
1. To yield a lower compression ratio without needing to reconfigure the stroke and piston dimension. It will not affect the dynamic displacement (the cc's is the common term). This allows a higher boost with a larger safety predetonation window.
2. The enlarged dome size allows room for valve size and flow path design to be optimized better. Larger dome equates to higher static volume in the chamber, which draws in more air in the combustion chamber, and with VVL and VVT in place, it can maximize overall volumetric efficiency for combustion process.
The difference in compression ratio between MCS and JCW in the B-series engines don't come from dome volume as I've speculated it earlier. I don't have a JCW head to compare against my MCS head to verify that speculation, but lately I've been working closely on buying a set of forged pistons from Supertech, JE, or Mahle. The way compression ratio can differ in the B-series engines actually stems from piston geometry. So there you have it.
JCW's piston crown has to be a slight different than the MCS. That's how they achieve a lowered compression ratio of 10.0 vs the MCS's 11.0. To this end, knowing that the piston crown room is a major reduction relative to that of MCS, this gives clearance for a higher valve lift and longer duration. For sake of higher valve lift and longer duration, I reckon it to be all achievable through both VVT and VVL by way of programming and/or a slightly taller intake cam profile on JCW. I can only hope to obtain a JCW head so I can research and compare, but for now, it's all speculation based on what I collect from talking with piston manufacturers and tuners.
The pistons I'm buying from Mahle to put on my MCS B48 will yield a final static compression ratio to 10.5. And that's by way of piston crown design.
By the way, to add to the laundry list of built internals, Mahle is now an official player in offering the forged pistons for the B-series engines.
Though in order to obtain a set, you'll need to buy it from the supra upgrade, part number is 197883929. I had just bought a set, though I only need 4. I'll end up buying another set and distribute it into 3 engines.
These are made for B58, but will be compatiable for our B46/B48 engines, too. Bore, Stroke, pin hole sizing will all match. The only downside I consider to be a con more than pro is the type of alloy they use. They chose 2618 Alloy instead of the 4032 which I would always prefer due to silicon content for resistance to heat-expansion. However, with the full list of features and strength this piston is built with, it's going to be one strong build no matter what. Cold start noise is the suspect in the 2618 alloy piston family.
The following 3 users liked this post by Yupetc:
#75
Got the B58 Supra performance pistons from Mahle (good for 1000 hp on B58 motors). I’ve checked all dimensions it’ll clear if we use stock sized conrods. These pistons will bring compression ratio down to 10.5, allowing tuner to do more.
The conrods I bought are forged 4340 chrome moly from maxspeedingrods. These are said to be equivalent to Eagle rods. I’ve seen a bunch of these used and reputable for track use on the Triumph. My ex-boss is a sentimental guy. He used to race triumph with these for years of good turnout. So far the rods are still being transported to me. Once I have them I’ll start putting the motor together, checking all bearing clearances and component tolerances.
I’ll work with ByteTronics for a tune, targeting between 300-350whp on their dyno. Goal is to achieve the highest power while being streetable and keeping everything safe. In this build, the weakest link will be the conrods and they are rated for 600-800bhp, that's plenty for me.
My full list:
Mahle Powerpak B58 SUPRA Pistons, 2618 Forged Alloy, Compression Ratio: 10.5 Part#197883929 (Comes with Piston Rings and Wrist Pins)
MaxSpeedingRods B48 H-Beam Rods, 4340 Forged Chrome Moly, Part#CR-BWB48-T
ARP 2000 Rod Bolts Part#201-6304
ARP 2000 Head Stud Bolts Part#201-4601
ARP 2000 Main Stud Bolts Part#201-5001
Bought these tools to go along with the install:
Piston Clearance Gauge
Bearing Clearance Gauge
Piston Rod Balancer
ARP Piston Ring Sleeve
Piston Ring Grinder
Connecting Rod installation guides
It's going to take some time as I don't intend to rush through all of this right now. Slow work is quality work in my hobby garage.
Last edited by Yupetc; 06-08-2020 at 10:36 AM.
The following 6 users liked this post by Yupetc:
8Balls (08-06-2020),
bratling (06-08-2020),
ClubsportF56S (06-07-2020),
J_L (10-14-2020),
Triwingar (10-30-2020),
and 1 others liked this post.