F55/F56 :: Hatch Talk (2014+) MINI Cooper and Cooper S (F55/F56) hatchback discussions.

F55/F56 Launch of the 2014 Mini Cooper (F56)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #226  
Old 01-14-2014 | 03:00 PM
NewCooperFanatic's Avatar
NewCooperFanatic
5th Gear
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
It's true, I looked up the weights of the R53 and R56 as well.

I doubt anyone will be able to feel that weight difference.

The biggest improvement is the leap from R56 vs F56 (non-S)
 
  #227  
Old 01-15-2014 | 05:44 PM
JohnBLZ's Avatar
JohnBLZ
5th Gear
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 810
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte NC
When we start hearing things like MPG and weight?

Honestly the MPG is going to be one of my major considerations in between buying an F56 and a JCW Clubbie.
 
  #228  
Old 01-15-2014 | 07:07 PM
afadeev's Avatar
afadeev
6th Gear
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 4
From: NYC
Originally Posted by JohnBLZ
When we start hearing things like MPG and weight?

Honestly the MPG is going to be one of my major considerations in between buying an F56 and a JCW Clubbie.
You can bet both power and mileage will go up in the F56 - this has been the history with every BMW and engine and new body style for a very long time.

Also, anyone buying old 2-nd gen MINI is primed to eat MASSIVE depreciation hit on a newly "old gen" car. My '08 MCS had been depreciating at the average rate of ~$2.5K / year (pretty good for a car!), but its value took a $3K hit just over this winter.

Just something to keep in mind if you are in love with the outgoing body style - buy used and save a ton, or BOHICA.

a
 
  #229  
Old 01-15-2014 | 08:05 PM
JohnBLZ's Avatar
JohnBLZ
5th Gear
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 810
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte NC
Originally Posted by afadeev
You can bet both power and mileage will go up in the F56 - this has been the history with every BMW and engine and new body style for a very long time.

Also, anyone buying old 2-nd gen MINI is primed to eat MASSIVE depreciation hit on a newly "old gen" car. My '08 MCS had been depreciating at the average rate of ~$2.5K / year (pretty good for a car!), but its value took a $3K hit just over this winter.

Just something to keep in mind if you are in love with the outgoing body style - buy used and save a ton, or BOHICA.

a
Yep, all things to consider. Just want to see some #'s
 
  #230  
Old 01-16-2014 | 07:28 AM
mtbscott's Avatar
mtbscott
6th Gear
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 3
From: H-town
Originally Posted by afadeev
Also, anyone buying old 2-nd gen MINI is primed to eat MASSIVE depreciation hit on a newly "old gen" car.
This is true. I just bought a 2011 MCS with 29K miles on it. Mid-level on options, bought and serviced locally, clean Carfax. It appears it was moved through three Group One dealerships because it wasn't moving before I found it. I watched its price drop on Autotrader several times from $20,500 to $16K when I bought it. I'm guessing the MSRP was in the $27-28K range. Mannheim auction value the week I bought it was $15800. Great time to be an R56 buyer, not so much to be a seller.

PS: Another one I looked at was a 2012 MCS with only 7600 miles. It was originally listed at $24K and when I bought mine was down to $18900. It was like new, but I didn't think worth the extra $3K over what I bought.
 

Last edited by mtbscott; 01-16-2014 at 07:59 AM.
  #231  
Old 01-16-2014 | 01:18 PM
JohnBLZ's Avatar
JohnBLZ
5th Gear
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 810
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte NC
Originally Posted by rodhot
if your main concern is mpg get a standard mini, not turbo'd! i hope the carbon issues are soon ironed out in all DI engines, until then i will avoid DI engines!! i would be interested in the 2.0 turbo engine for sure, a few mods should get 275 hp easily, as i got out of my 01 jetta 1.8T with standard port injection, no carbon or sludge issues until trade at 200,000 miles
Not my main, but if I wasn't concerned about MPG, I'd be driving a hemi
 
  #232  
Old 01-16-2014 | 10:18 PM
chuck r's Avatar
chuck r
3rd Gear
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 162
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by JohnBLZ
Not my main, but if I wasn't concerned about MPG, I'd be driving a hemi
I am worried about MPG but I still drive a Hemi! But it doesn't stop me from wanting a Mini.
 
  #233  
Old 01-17-2014 | 07:09 PM
Btwyx's Avatar
Btwyx
6th Gear
iTrader: (2)
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,535
Likes: 1
From: Mountain View, CA
Originally Posted by STF_U
Still waiting on specifics like weight (although 1 article I read said 60-90lbs heavier), mpg, and if the S will finally get a spare tire!
I thought specifics had already been posted. MINI have posted them on their new MINI page: http://miniusa.com/NewMINI Its under the pop up for "Engine Specs", though that's stopped popping up for me.

I scraped the data out of the source:


http://btwyx.com/Pictures/NewMINISpecs.pdf
 
  #234  
Old 01-19-2014 | 10:16 AM
bratling's Avatar
bratling
Super Moderator
iTrader: (2)
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 217
From: North of Boston, MA
Originally Posted by Btwyx
I thought specifics had already been posted. MINI have posted them on their new MINI page: http://miniusa.com/NewMINI Its under the pop up for "Engine Specs", though that's stopped popping up for me. I scraped the data out of the source: http://btwyx.com/Pictures/NewMINISpecs.pdf
I'm surprised that increasing the engine displacement by 25% (1600cc to 2000) only netted 4% more power (181 hp to 189). What's up with that, BMW? Leaving room for easy, cheap gains in the pricey JCW version? That would make for some nice easy money.

Someone tell me what I'm missing. Or mistaken about.
 
  #235  
Old 01-19-2014 | 10:54 AM
afadeev's Avatar
afadeev
6th Gear
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 4
From: NYC
Originally Posted by bratling
I'm surprised that increasing the engine displacement by 25% (1600cc to 2000) only netted 4% more power (181 hp to 189). What's up with that, BMW? Leaving room for easy, cheap gains in the pricey JCW version? That would make for some nice easy money.

Someone tell me what I'm missing. Or mistaken about.
Bingo!

See BMW's N20 engine family that powers 320 (~185hp) and 328 (~245hp) cars: same 2.0L engine, different turbo tunes and power outputs.

You can guess where the first engine package goes (MCS).
You can also guess which car will get the second package (JCW).

a
 
  #236  
Old 01-19-2014 | 10:57 AM
gchin's Avatar
gchin
2nd Gear
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 105
Likes: 2
From: Elk Grove, CA
That's what I want to see in all production mini models!

Originally Posted by afadeev
Bingo!

See BMW's N20 engine family that powers 320 (~185hp) and 328 (~245hp) cars: same 2.0L engine, different turbo tunes and power outputs.

You can guess where the first engine package goes (MCS).
You can also guess which car will get the second package (JCW).

a
 
  #237  
Old 01-19-2014 | 01:07 PM
Btwyx's Avatar
Btwyx
6th Gear
iTrader: (2)
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,535
Likes: 1
From: Mountain View, CA
BMW is tuning the engine for drivability (see the enormous torque coming in at 1250) and economy. They'll leave power for the JCW.
 
  #238  
Old 01-19-2014 | 04:32 PM
bratling's Avatar
bratling
Super Moderator
iTrader: (2)
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 217
From: North of Boston, MA
Originally Posted by Btwyx
BMW is tuning the engine for drivability (see the enormous torque coming in at 1250) and economy. They'll leave power for the JCW.
I guess. I would have expects them to push the S up over the magic "200" number for marketing purposes if nothing else.

On the bright side, this implies that when the aftermarket starts tuning, the engine should have plenty of headroom for affordable gains.

Sent from my iPhone using NAMotoring
 
  #239  
Old 01-19-2014 | 07:26 PM
borderwave2's Avatar
borderwave2
4th Gear
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 309
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by bratling
I guess. I would have expects them to push the S up over the magic "200" number for marketing purposes if nothing else.

On the bright side, this implies that when the aftermarket starts tuning, the engine should have plenty of headroom for affordable gains.

Sent from my iPhone using NAMotoring
A bigger engine doesn't always mean there is extra headroom for tuning. Weaker pistons and a smaller turbo can make "easy hp" impossible. Also, the MINI aftermarket has always been very small, and out tuning options are and always have been very limited compared to most other manufacturers.

Something for you to chew on while we wait to see how good the B38 engine is...


Ford Focus ST 2.0L turbo / 252hp
BMW 328i 2.0L turbo /240hp
Mk 7 GTI 2.0L turbo / 217hp
Caddilac ATS 2.0L turbo /270hp
Subaru WRX 2.0L turbo /265hp
F56 Mini Cooper S 2.0L turbo / 189hp

If you can read this list and not feel like you're getting ripped off, it's time to put down the kool-aid.
 
  #240  
Old 01-19-2014 | 08:51 PM
gchin's Avatar
gchin
2nd Gear
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 105
Likes: 2
From: Elk Grove, CA
Any numbers for the auto transmission max. torque?

Maybe F56 Mini Cooper S 2.0L turbo is limited to 189hp for reliability?
 
  #241  
Old 01-19-2014 | 09:42 PM
RobMuntean's Avatar
RobMuntean
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,970
Likes: 4
From: West Bloomfield, Michigan
Originally Posted by borderwave2
A bigger engine doesn't always mean there is extra headroom for tuning. Weaker pistons and a smaller turbo can make "easy hp" impossible. Also, the MINI aftermarket has always been very small, and out tuning options are and always have been very limited compared to most other manufacturers. Something for you to chew on while we wait to see how good the B38 engine is... Ford Focus ST 2.0L turbo / 252hp BMW 328i 2.0L turbo /240hp Mk 7 GTI 2.0L turbo / 217hp Caddilac ATS 2.0L turbo /270hp Subaru WRX 2.0L turbo /265hp F56 Mini Cooper S 2.0L turbo / 189hp If you can read this list and not feel like you're getting ripped off, it's time to put down the kool-aid.
This is the reason I'm gonna be looking at the STi, MK7, and 328i when I'm in the market in a year in a half or two. The JCW sounds pretty good though I must admit.
 
  #242  
Old 01-20-2014 | 08:23 AM
mtbscott's Avatar
mtbscott
6th Gear
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 3
From: H-town
I suspect the new larger engine will be much more robust than past ones. Its output doesn't bother me, the car is lighter than most of its competitors, and there's plenty of headroom left for future factory upgrades.
 
  #243  
Old 01-22-2014 | 01:09 PM
devinw's Avatar
devinw
2nd Gear
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: SE Portland, OR
This new MINI looks like a$$. Period. They have ruined this car. Glad I have my R53.
 
  #244  
Old 01-22-2014 | 11:33 PM
MiniKar's Avatar
MiniKar
5th Gear
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 785
Likes: 33
From: Nevada
I'm glad to hear that I am not the only one. . . .

Glad to hear that others think the " NEW " Mini is not the beauty BMW thinks it is with the restyling.


I bet that small changes may take place to the front and rear once they see the sales numbers drop.
 
  #245  
Old 01-28-2014 | 07:13 PM
borderwave2's Avatar
borderwave2
4th Gear
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 309
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by mtbscott
I suspect the new larger engine will be much more robust than past ones. Its output doesn't bother me, the car is lighter than most of its competitors, and there's plenty of headroom left for future factory upgrades.
Unless you have engineering knowledge about this engine, it's impossible to say anything like that. BMW will likely use weaker pistons and slightly higher compression in the S version than the JCW. Judging by past experiences I'd say there won't be that much room for future factory upgrades without serious changes such as a new turbo etc.



The competition in the hot hatch market is getting stiff, and it would be too forgiving to say the mini will have "plenty of headroom" when you should have to mod a car to get it to be near the power level of its direct competitors in the first place.
 
  #246  
Old 01-29-2014 | 09:36 AM
Gentlefury's Avatar
Gentlefury
3rd Gear
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
Originally Posted by devinw
This new MINI looks like a$$. Period. They have ruined this car. Glad I have my R53.
I feel like this is said EVERYTIME anything is changed.

It looks amazing! I will def be upgrading mine.
 
  #247  
Old 01-29-2014 | 12:08 PM
russmini's Avatar
russmini
4th Gear
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 449
Likes: 6
From: Northern California
Originally Posted by borderwave2
Unless you have engineering knowledge about this engine, it's impossible to say anything like that. BMW will likely use weaker pistons and slightly higher compression in the S version than the JCW. Judging by past experiences I'd say there won't be that much room for future factory upgrades without serious changes such as a new turbo etc.



The competition in the hot hatch market is getting stiff, and it would be too forgiving to say the mini will have "plenty of headroom" when you should have to mod a car to get it to be near the power level of its direct competitors in the first place.
"BMW will likely use weaker pistons...". Based on what information? Why would they use "weaker pistons"?
 
  #248  
Old 01-29-2014 | 12:53 PM
jrs66's Avatar
jrs66
3rd Gear
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
It's pretty funny that people seem to be making the 'plenty of room for tuning' argument. How could they possibly know this? I think it's a somewhat absurd thing to say without knowledge of the engine and ecu. Speaking of the ecu, you can bet they they have made it more difficult to crack into than ever. We're a long way away from knowing anything about tuning capabilities of this car!
 
  #249  
Old 01-29-2014 | 01:26 PM
RobMuntean's Avatar
RobMuntean
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,970
Likes: 4
From: West Bloomfield, Michigan
Originally Posted by jrs66
It's pretty funny that people seem to be making the 'plenty of room for tuning' argument. How could they possibly know this? I think it's a somewhat absurd thing to say without knowledge of the engine and ecu. Speaking of the ecu, you can bet they they have made it more difficult to crack into than ever. We're a long way away from knowing anything about tuning capabilities of this car!
The BMW platform will give options to MINI owners since it is a BMW engine, not a Prince engine. You can imagine tuning won't be as complicated like before with the N14 and N18 engines.
 
  #250  
Old 01-29-2014 | 01:37 PM
jrs66's Avatar
jrs66
3rd Gear
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by RobMuntean
The BMW platform will give options to MINI owners since it is a BMW engine, not a Prince engine. You can imagine tuning won't be as complicated like before with the N14 and N18 engines.
Sorry, but I can only imagine that tuning will be much more complicated with a new engine. BMW spends much time and effort trying to lock ecus.

But anyway, the engines tolerance to be tuned is simply unknown by anyone right now as it's a new engine.
 


Quick Reply: F55/F56 Launch of the 2014 Mini Cooper (F56)



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:05 PM.