F55/F56 Launch of the 2014 Mini Cooper (F56)
#228
Also, anyone buying old 2-nd gen MINI is primed to eat MASSIVE depreciation hit on a newly "old gen" car. My '08 MCS had been depreciating at the average rate of ~$2.5K / year (pretty good for a car!), but its value took a $3K hit just over this winter.
Just something to keep in mind if you are in love with the outgoing body style - buy used and save a ton, or BOHICA.
a
#229
You can bet both power and mileage will go up in the F56 - this has been the history with every BMW and engine and new body style for a very long time.
Also, anyone buying old 2-nd gen MINI is primed to eat MASSIVE depreciation hit on a newly "old gen" car. My '08 MCS had been depreciating at the average rate of ~$2.5K / year (pretty good for a car!), but its value took a $3K hit just over this winter.
Just something to keep in mind if you are in love with the outgoing body style - buy used and save a ton, or BOHICA.
a
Also, anyone buying old 2-nd gen MINI is primed to eat MASSIVE depreciation hit on a newly "old gen" car. My '08 MCS had been depreciating at the average rate of ~$2.5K / year (pretty good for a car!), but its value took a $3K hit just over this winter.
Just something to keep in mind if you are in love with the outgoing body style - buy used and save a ton, or BOHICA.
a
#230
PS: Another one I looked at was a 2012 MCS with only 7600 miles. It was originally listed at $24K and when I bought mine was down to $18900. It was like new, but I didn't think worth the extra $3K over what I bought.
Last edited by mtbscott; 01-16-2014 at 07:59 AM.
#231
if your main concern is mpg get a standard mini, not turbo'd! i hope the carbon issues are soon ironed out in all DI engines, until then i will avoid DI engines!! i would be interested in the 2.0 turbo engine for sure, a few mods should get 275 hp easily, as i got out of my 01 jetta 1.8T with standard port injection, no carbon or sludge issues until trade at 200,000 miles
#233
I scraped the data out of the source:
http://btwyx.com/Pictures/NewMINISpecs.pdf
#234
I thought specifics had already been posted. MINI have posted them on their new MINI page: http://miniusa.com/NewMINI Its under the pop up for "Engine Specs", though that's stopped popping up for me. I scraped the data out of the source: http://btwyx.com/Pictures/NewMINISpecs.pdf
Someone tell me what I'm missing. Or mistaken about.
#235
I'm surprised that increasing the engine displacement by 25% (1600cc to 2000) only netted 4% more power (181 hp to 189). What's up with that, BMW? Leaving room for easy, cheap gains in the pricey JCW version? That would make for some nice easy money.
Someone tell me what I'm missing. Or mistaken about.
Someone tell me what I'm missing. Or mistaken about.
See BMW's N20 engine family that powers 320 (~185hp) and 328 (~245hp) cars: same 2.0L engine, different turbo tunes and power outputs.
You can guess where the first engine package goes (MCS).
You can also guess which car will get the second package (JCW).
a
#236
That's what I want to see in all production mini models!
#238
On the bright side, this implies that when the aftermarket starts tuning, the engine should have plenty of headroom for affordable gains.
Sent from my iPhone using NAMotoring
#239
I guess. I would have expects them to push the S up over the magic "200" number for marketing purposes if nothing else.
On the bright side, this implies that when the aftermarket starts tuning, the engine should have plenty of headroom for affordable gains.
Sent from my iPhone using NAMotoring
On the bright side, this implies that when the aftermarket starts tuning, the engine should have plenty of headroom for affordable gains.
Sent from my iPhone using NAMotoring
Something for you to chew on while we wait to see how good the B38 engine is...
Ford Focus ST 2.0L turbo / 252hp
BMW 328i 2.0L turbo /240hp
Mk 7 GTI 2.0L turbo / 217hp
Caddilac ATS 2.0L turbo /270hp
Subaru WRX 2.0L turbo /265hp
F56 Mini Cooper S 2.0L turbo / 189hp
If you can read this list and not feel like you're getting ripped off, it's time to put down the kool-aid.
#241
A bigger engine doesn't always mean there is extra headroom for tuning. Weaker pistons and a smaller turbo can make "easy hp" impossible. Also, the MINI aftermarket has always been very small, and out tuning options are and always have been very limited compared to most other manufacturers. Something for you to chew on while we wait to see how good the B38 engine is... Ford Focus ST 2.0L turbo / 252hp BMW 328i 2.0L turbo /240hp Mk 7 GTI 2.0L turbo / 217hp Caddilac ATS 2.0L turbo /270hp Subaru WRX 2.0L turbo /265hp F56 Mini Cooper S 2.0L turbo / 189hp If you can read this list and not feel like you're getting ripped off, it's time to put down the kool-aid.
#242
#244
#245
The competition in the hot hatch market is getting stiff, and it would be too forgiving to say the mini will have "plenty of headroom" when you should have to mod a car to get it to be near the power level of its direct competitors in the first place.
#246
#247
Unless you have engineering knowledge about this engine, it's impossible to say anything like that. BMW will likely use weaker pistons and slightly higher compression in the S version than the JCW. Judging by past experiences I'd say there won't be that much room for future factory upgrades without serious changes such as a new turbo etc.
The competition in the hot hatch market is getting stiff, and it would be too forgiving to say the mini will have "plenty of headroom" when you should have to mod a car to get it to be near the power level of its direct competitors in the first place.
The competition in the hot hatch market is getting stiff, and it would be too forgiving to say the mini will have "plenty of headroom" when you should have to mod a car to get it to be near the power level of its direct competitors in the first place.
#248
It's pretty funny that people seem to be making the 'plenty of room for tuning' argument. How could they possibly know this? I think it's a somewhat absurd thing to say without knowledge of the engine and ecu. Speaking of the ecu, you can bet they they have made it more difficult to crack into than ever. We're a long way away from knowing anything about tuning capabilities of this car!
#249
It's pretty funny that people seem to be making the 'plenty of room for tuning' argument. How could they possibly know this? I think it's a somewhat absurd thing to say without knowledge of the engine and ecu. Speaking of the ecu, you can bet they they have made it more difficult to crack into than ever. We're a long way away from knowing anything about tuning capabilities of this car!
#250
But anyway, the engines tolerance to be tuned is simply unknown by anyone right now as it's a new engine.