Interior/Exterior Uber at it AGAIN!
#27
Having setup hosting for several companies myself, I can say that there is a HUGE difference between customer services for a standalone solution over a shared solution. With that Mark has to feel secure that his business is functioning day to day as this is his livelihood. Insurance is always a good thing....
Last edited by daflake; 05-14-2007 at 12:16 AM.
#28
Beats me why anyone would pay $45 for a decal but that is based on my own purchasing patterns. That said I'm sure that there have been some sold to someone. Again, another case of information presented that each of us can read, ponder, and make our own buying decisions. Let the marketplace determine a product's success or failure.
Mark
Mark
#29
I will never buy anything from Palo Uber again. After my Bondo filled hood scoop fell apart, I was forced to deal with them and their scams. All of their products are over priced and aren't very special. I have so much to say but I will let them fail on there own.
M
M
__________________
2013 GP2 #295, 270whp/310wtq, KO4 47mm Turbo, 18" NM Wheels, Alta intake, Manic Stage III+, HFS-3 Meth, 30% E85 Blend, Forged IC, Alta Hot Pipe, P&P/Ceramic Exhaust Manifold, m3 Extreme Ceramic DP, Vibrant mid res, 4" Double walled Tips, WMW/KW V3 CO, Alta Rear CA, CREE Fogs, Black out F/R Rings and Gas Cap, M7 CF Front Splitter, and No Stickers. MORE TO COME!! Previous 04Triple Black 17% Alta, MM Air/H2O, CAI, OBX Header, FBT Head, Shrick Cam, 234whp
2013 GP2 #295, 270whp/310wtq, KO4 47mm Turbo, 18" NM Wheels, Alta intake, Manic Stage III+, HFS-3 Meth, 30% E85 Blend, Forged IC, Alta Hot Pipe, P&P/Ceramic Exhaust Manifold, m3 Extreme Ceramic DP, Vibrant mid res, 4" Double walled Tips, WMW/KW V3 CO, Alta Rear CA, CREE Fogs, Black out F/R Rings and Gas Cap, M7 CF Front Splitter, and No Stickers. MORE TO COME!! Previous 04Triple Black 17% Alta, MM Air/H2O, CAI, OBX Header, FBT Head, Shrick Cam, 234whp
#30
Not to mention, that if the wheels are cheap honda wheels trying to be sold as high performance special wheels....and their special expensive lugnuts just rust.......probably 90% of their products are just hyped up cheap honda parts that are of a low quality. But considering how much they charge, i would dare to say that most of their customers would be upset to find out that they could have save massive amounts of money and gotten the same product.
#31
There are multiple threads about customer service issues. There are the rusted nuts problems where people have complained only to never hear back from PU. There are the poorly anodized aerials that were replaced once only to fade again, and then no responses at all from PU. And there are multiple people who were discouraged when they found out that their wheels were fakes and could have been bought for cheaper. And apparently mario has had problems with their scoop and getting them to fix the problem. It seems that if you get a good product (I'm sure they must have some on that site somewhere) you get great customer service, and thats awesome. But, the second you get a bad product (they seem to have lots of them), you will get no customer service and will be ignored.
Not to mention, that if the wheels are cheap honda wheels trying to be sold as high performance special wheels....and their special expensive lugnuts just rust.......probably 90% of their products are just hyped up cheap honda parts that are of a low quality. But considering how much they charge, i would dare to say that most of their customers would be upset to find out that they could have save massive amounts of money and gotten the same product.
Mark
#32
Totally agreed....though it becomes hard to research wheels well when you have a company like PU saying that they were special fabricated and designed for great performance when its not even true.
#33
It would be nice to know that vendors are held to a standard of integrity that is not suspect at best... Just my 2 pennies, as I have not purchased and will not purchase anything from PU. I would also add that I have purchased from Mini-Madness (non PU parts), and received exemplary sevice!
Last edited by minimarks; 05-14-2007 at 09:36 AM.
#34
#35
6th Gear
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Carmel Valley Village, CA
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have bought parts from Mini Madness, Love the parts and service!
But NAM doesnt like P|U much! I must say, they make unrealistic claims with little to no backup data. They wont last much longer here. and for a vender that has been here as long as MM im surprised to see the association.
I really hope to see you continue to do well George! But p|u stinks.
But NAM doesnt like P|U much! I must say, they make unrealistic claims with little to no backup data. They wont last much longer here. and for a vender that has been here as long as MM im surprised to see the association.
I really hope to see you continue to do well George! But p|u stinks.
#36
I have bought parts from Mini Madness, Love the parts and service!
But NAM doesnt like P|U much! I must say, they make unrealistic claims with little to no backup data. They wont last much longer here. and for a vender that has been here as long as MM im surprised to see the association.
I really hope to see you continue to do well George! But p|u stinks.
But NAM doesnt like P|U much! I must say, they make unrealistic claims with little to no backup data. They wont last much longer here. and for a vender that has been here as long as MM im surprised to see the association.
I really hope to see you continue to do well George! But p|u stinks.
MM has seen and understands that Palo Uber makes some great stuff and wants to share it with Mini community
Last edited by Passat774; 05-15-2007 at 05:31 AM. Reason: Fix Font
#37
It means that MM wants to make money. The fact that they sell Uber rebadged parts doesn't mean they support their tactics. Assuming PU items were worth the money -- an assumption I would definitely not feel justified to make --- I'd rather deal with a 3rd party to get them and not have to put up with PU's bs. It's one thing to like a company's products (however undeserved that loyalty is), it's quite another to dismiss all it's transgressions as hallucinations.
#38
Beats me why anyone would pay $45 for a decal but that is based on my own purchasing patterns. That said I'm sure that there have been some sold to someone. Again, another case of information presented that each of us can read, ponder, and make our own buying decisions. Let the marketplace determine a product's success or failure.
Mark
Mark
#39
6th Gear
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,952
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
NAM has seen and understands that Palo Uber's cheque clears every month.
The question becomes does NAM police advertisers or let the market shake them out. I for one do not want NAM to decide who products are worthy of being presented to the community. Every vendor deserves a fair shake and then let the community decide if they spend their money. Until any vendor is proven to be a scammer and is running off with peoples money and not suppling product they should have the ability to advertise on NAM. It's up to us in the community to decide if we want to buy these products from that vendor. We also have the ability to call it as we see it so long as it's not in a libilous manner.
#40
In general, I agree with you, g, but it's not just about whether they supply the product, but also whether the product they supplied is what it was held out to be. I agree, though, that I should be allowed the choice of deciding for myself whether or not I am willing to go with a less than honorable company. On the other hand, people come to NAM to receive the best info they can on all things MINI. They should feel confident that ordering from a sponsor should be less risky than pulling a name from the phonebook or web search engine. Of course, threads such as these do help.
#41
Yah, you're totally right dude....nothing like the quality of sportmax wheels(), or "stainless" lug nuts that rust, or an antenna that even MM said (on NAM) was "inadequately anodized"...or maybe they just liked the scoops that were poorly made. Oh wait....you know what must have drawn them in? I bet it was the $550 vinyl stripes that were designed by a completely unknown tiny little artist, Palo Uber.
Last edited by Rally@StanceDesign; 05-15-2007 at 08:35 AM.
#42
Yah, you're totally right dude....nothing like the quality of sportmax wheels(), or "stainless" lug nuts that rust, or an antenna that even MM said (on NAM) was "inadequately anodized"...or maybe they just liked the scoops that were poorly made. Oh wait....you know what must have drawn them in? I bet it was the $550 vinyl stripes that were designed by a completely unknown tiny little artist, Palo Uber.
They nicest thing about all the parts you just listed, is that I do not own any of them I guess, I just got really lucky with my Palo Uber parts
#43
haha yah i bet the pulley was really worth hundreds more than the others. You know, since they showed comparison dyno sheets and stuff . Nothing like money that could have been better spent on other mods as well.
#44
Yah, you're totally right dude....nothing like the quality of sportmax wheels(), or "stainless" lug nuts that rust, or an antenna that even MM said (on NAM) was "inadequately anodized"...or maybe they just liked the scoops that were poorly made. Oh wait....you know what must have drawn them in? I bet it was the $550 vinyl stripes that were designed by a completely unknown tiny little artist, Palo Uber.
Mark
#45
The point to take away here is that Madness has been on the site since 2002 and is offering to help out with any of the customer service issues that a few people had with P/U products. If you have a product problem give them a call and they will try to help resolve the problem.
Mark
Mark
Very true, and i have faith in MM. But, at the same time, after being told by MM that he would get a better antenna, gnatster hasnt heard from anyone in 4 weeks and has posted every 2 weeks asking for a response in his thread. So clearly, the MM thing isnt really helping much.
#46
Very true, and i have faith in MM. But, at the same time, after being told by MM that he would get a better antenna, gnatster hasnt heard from anyone in 4 weeks and has posted every 2 weeks asking for a response in his thread. So clearly, the MM thing isnt really helping much.
Mark
#47
The posts:
https://www.northamericanmotoring.co...1&postcount=92
https://www.northamericanmotoring.co...5&postcount=96
https://www.northamericanmotoring.co...&postcount=101
#48
6th Gear
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,952
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I did get a reply back from MM late yesterday, the author was not identified.
Mark, I did speak to George a while back and noted it in the thread.
As I have stated before my biggest beef in the entire issue is the fact a P.U. rep at AMVIV told me with a straight face an object I was looking at that was clearly painted was anodized. That one thing has turned me off to P.U. I have no beef at all with MM and have purchased parts from them since and also have a substantial part on order.
I can accept that at times items and/or vendors will have an issue. Thats life, the real test is how the vendor works with the customer to remedy the issue. I do not think I am unreasonable. If you would like I can document multiple incidents where an issue has cropped up and how the vendor has resolved the issue in a manner that shows the vendor is is interested in cultivating a long term relationship and is not out to just sell me a part.
On second thought. I'll start a thread on just that very subject...
How a vendor made it right. Look for it soon.
Mark, I did speak to George a while back and noted it in the thread.
As I have stated before my biggest beef in the entire issue is the fact a P.U. rep at AMVIV told me with a straight face an object I was looking at that was clearly painted was anodized. That one thing has turned me off to P.U. I have no beef at all with MM and have purchased parts from them since and also have a substantial part on order.
I can accept that at times items and/or vendors will have an issue. Thats life, the real test is how the vendor works with the customer to remedy the issue. I do not think I am unreasonable. If you would like I can document multiple incidents where an issue has cropped up and how the vendor has resolved the issue in a manner that shows the vendor is is interested in cultivating a long term relationship and is not out to just sell me a part.
On second thought. I'll start a thread on just that very subject...
How a vendor made it right. Look for it soon.
#49
I did get a reply back from MM late yesterday, the author was not identified.
Mark, I did speak to George a while back and noted it in the thread.
As I have stated before my biggest beef in the entire issue is the fact a P.U. rep at AMVIV told me with a straight face an object I was looking at that was clearly painted was anodized. That one thing has turned me off to P.U. I have no beef at all with MM and have purchased parts from them since and also have a substantial part on order.
I can accept that at times items and/or vendors will have an issue. Thats life, the real test is how the vendor works with the customer to remedy the issue. I do not think I am unreasonable. If you would like I can document multiple incidents where an issue has cropped up and how the vendor has resolved the issue in a manner that shows the vendor is is interested in cultivating a long term relationship and is not out to just sell me a part.
On second thought. I'll start a thread on just that very subject...
How a vendor made it right. Look for it soon.
Mark, I did speak to George a while back and noted it in the thread.
As I have stated before my biggest beef in the entire issue is the fact a P.U. rep at AMVIV told me with a straight face an object I was looking at that was clearly painted was anodized. That one thing has turned me off to P.U. I have no beef at all with MM and have purchased parts from them since and also have a substantial part on order.
I can accept that at times items and/or vendors will have an issue. Thats life, the real test is how the vendor works with the customer to remedy the issue. I do not think I am unreasonable. If you would like I can document multiple incidents where an issue has cropped up and how the vendor has resolved the issue in a manner that shows the vendor is is interested in cultivating a long term relationship and is not out to just sell me a part.
On second thought. I'll start a thread on just that very subject...
How a vendor made it right. Look for it soon.