R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006) Cooper (R50) and Cooper S (R53) hatchback discussion.

R50/53 JCW-Cooper "Not S" after mod he says 0-60 to be 8.9 secs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 06-28-2003, 12:42 PM
bignose13's Avatar
bignose13
bignose13 is offline
2nd Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Panguitch Utah Summer, Kamas Utah Winter
Posts: 109
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ok i'm confused, more than usual.
According to my cooper USA book from the dealer it says 0-60 to be 8.5 secs but when you look at the JCW website dyno numbers it says after mod the 0-60 is then 8.9. So does that mean the cooper over here is less restricted in the first place?
Ok i have just looked up in the UK, they are saying 9.2 0-60 stock now that is a big difference between here and there...anyone know why?
Does any one know if the cooper JCW kit is coming here . It says all world dealer from april 2nd 2003, but i have only heard of the "s" coming here.

http://www.johncooper.co.uk/cgi-bin/...ersions_FS.htm

Help my insanity

_________________



Black Mini Cooper 2002, Tint, Old Style Rally Light Kit.
. .......
An English Guy Living in Utah
 
  #2  
Old 06-28-2003, 03:47 PM
rrypma's Avatar
rrypma
rrypma is offline
4th Gear
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dobbs Ferry, NY
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is the English mile any longer than the American one?
 
  #3  
Old 06-28-2003, 05:07 PM
dominicminicoopers's Avatar
dominicminicoopers
dominicminicoopers is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 4,831
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Damn! that metric system...screws everything up.
 
  #4  
Old 06-28-2003, 05:36 PM
orbhot's Avatar
orbhot
orbhot is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Dunedin, FL, USA
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No, the miles in the 0-60mph times are the same. You will often seen these type of differences in what a manufacturer quotes as it's 0-60 time and what can be done in the real world on an average day. The Cooper S says 6.9 0-60 in all of it's adds, though every magazine article I've read where they actually tested 0-60 (instead of going off manufacturer claims) shows ranges of 7.1 to 7.5, never 6.9. But of course this doesn't just happen with MINIs, I think all manufacturers quote the lowest possible 0-60 time under the absolute best conditions, and rarely match a magazine's tests.
 
  #5  
Old 06-28-2003, 05:55 PM
minihune's Avatar
minihune
minihune is offline
OVERDRIVE - Racing Champion
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mililani, Hawaii
Posts: 15,260
Received 69 Likes on 66 Posts
>>ok i'm confused, more than usual.
You don't have to be confused. I can clear it all up (as mud).

>>According to my cooper USA book from the dealer it says 0-60 to be 8.5 secs but when you look at the JCW website dyno numbers it says after mod the 0-60 is then 8.9. So does that mean the cooper over here is less restricted in the first place?

Nope. You have misread the fine print. All of the data in the UK is based on metric distances. So acceleration times are judged against 0-100 Km/h which roughly translates to 0-62 mph not 0-60 hence the sligthly longer times. It is not your imagination. Also the UK numbers are more realistic compared to the very optimistic US numbers. The real times will vary with test conditions and the skill of the person and accuracy of the timing. Just take everything with a grain of salt or try it out and time yourself.

>>Ok i have just looked up in the UK, they are saying 9.2 0-60 stock now that is a big difference between here and there...anyone know why?

So if we assume that we can compare the numbers for the UK with the stock MC getting a time of 9.2 seconds and the JCW MC getting 8.9 seconds then that is good.

The UK time for the JCW kit MCS is 6.7 sec for 1-100 km/hr or 0-62 mph. Still conservative. Put on some proper lightweight wheels and you can shave another 0.2 sec off.

>>Does any one know if the cooper JCW kit is coming here . It says all world dealer from april 2nd 2003, but i have only heard of the "s" coming here.

For now only the MCS will get the JCW kit in the US (rough cost $6000).

>>http://www.johncooper.co.uk/cgi-bin/...ersions_FS.htm
>>
>>Help my insanity

You should recover. Just get in your MINI and do some motorin.

>><!-- BBCode Start --><IMG SRC=" https://www.northamericanmotoring.com/albums/album04/ehv.thumb.jpg"><!-- BBCode End -->
>>
>>
>>Black Mini Cooper 2002, Tint, Old Style Rally Light Kit.
>>. .......
>>An English Guy Living in Utah
>>
 
  #6  
Old 06-28-2003, 08:51 PM
red03miniS's Avatar
red03miniS
red03miniS is offline
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: los angeles/san francisco
Posts: 2,782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
>>No, the miles in the 0-60mph times are the same. You will often seen these type of differences in what a manufacturer quotes as it's 0-60 time and what can be done in the real world on an average day. The Cooper S says 6.9 0-60 in all of it's adds, though every magazine article I've read where they actually tested 0-60 (instead of going off manufacturer claims) shows ranges of 7.1 to 7.5, never 6.9. But of course this doesn't just happen with MINIs, I think all manufacturers quote the lowest possible 0-60 time under the absolute best conditions, and rarely match a magazine's tests.


hmm actually i think you are mistaken. manufactures mostly ALWAYS quote more conservatively than what can be done.

if a vette runs 0-6- in 4.6 seconds, the manufacture will always say 5.0 seconds

magazines always run them quicker :smile:
 
  #7  
Old 06-28-2003, 10:04 PM
bignose13's Avatar
bignose13
bignose13 is offline
2nd Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Panguitch Utah Summer, Kamas Utah Winter
Posts: 109
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It just seems to be a big difference between the 2 quoted times from Mini them selves. 9.2 and 8.5.
Damn metric system....
 
  #8  
Old 06-28-2003, 10:05 PM
red03miniS's Avatar
red03miniS
red03miniS is offline
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: los angeles/san francisco
Posts: 2,782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
>>
>>Damn metric system....



 
  #9  
Old 06-29-2003, 09:27 AM
miniblues's Avatar
miniblues
miniblues is offline
4th Gear
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the 6.9 time for MCS & 8.5 for MC is wishful thinking by bimmer, obviously the 6.9 is a little suspect since they craved for under 7 secs....more accurate times which have been verified pretty much are MCS 7.5 ad MC at 9.5....the new MCS works are showing 6.6 to 6.8 secs..so all $5700 mod gets you is an improvement of 1 to 3 tenths of a second improvement 0 to 60 over the stock MCS, laugh....bimmer advanced claimed the works at 6.3, but latest test article from Car & Driver stated no way, that quote was way to ambitious, that the orginal claims in the field were actually reality.....just a note, drove the new Mitsu Evo and it is incredibly fast, but also highly question the 4.4 0 to 60 claims...that is in 911 Turbo territory which I have ridden in which is a whole different ball game, laugh....although I guess you only need one 0 to 60 run in perfect conditions to get a claim you can advertize...cheers
 
  #10  
Old 06-29-2003, 12:02 PM
Sarcux's Avatar
Sarcux
Sarcux is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Macedonia, Ohio
Posts: 2,431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Could be a misprint? The figures at my dealership off of a MINI2 article say 6.9 seconds. That sounds more right.

 
  #11  
Old 06-29-2003, 02:05 PM
Oilman930's Avatar
Oilman930
Oilman930 is offline
3rd Gear
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Phila, PA
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi All,

Actually what he is asking in the beginning is if the JCW kit is comming to the US for the regular Cooper.The 0-100 km/h times he quoted are for the regular Cooper with the JCW kit.

The JCW kit for the regular Cooper is not comming to North America.Just for my own curiosity I phoned JCW.It turns out that the kit is too loud and too dirty to pass North American regulations.MiniUSA won't even let JCW sell the kits directly to consumers in NA.That ends that.
 
  #12  
Old 06-29-2003, 02:27 PM
bignose13's Avatar
bignose13
bignose13 is offline
2nd Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Panguitch Utah Summer, Kamas Utah Winter
Posts: 109
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well that answers that does'nt it.... I wonder why the kit for the 'S' is not Dirty?

 
  #13  
Old 07-01-2003, 10:04 AM
orbhot's Avatar
orbhot
orbhot is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Dunedin, FL, USA
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
>>hmm actually i think you are mistaken. manufactures mostly ALWAYS quote more conservatively than what can be done.
>>
>>if a vette runs 0-6- in 4.6 seconds, the manufacture will always say 5.0 seconds
>>
>>magazines always run them quicker :smile:

Red... Then explain why every article ever produced about the S where they actually tested 0-60 instead of going off manufacturer claims shows at least 7.1, but all US documentation for the S shows 6.9... conservative? I think not.

_________________
[img]albums/album25/akk.jpg[/img] VinceAndJessica.com

Einstein said E=MC2, I say S=MC2
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
igzekyativ
MINIs & Minis for Sale
34
07-16-2020 12:54 PM
Etrain
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
11
08-20-2015 10:22 AM
minipopkart
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
2
08-13-2015 05:22 AM
FatherG
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
11
08-07-2015 07:49 PM
joelcseymour
MINIs & Minis for Sale
1
08-07-2015 12:43 PM



Quick Reply: R50/53 JCW-Cooper "Not S" after mod he says 0-60 to be 8.9 secs



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:46 AM.