R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006) Cooper (R50) and Cooper S (R53) hatchback discussion.

R50/53 Tires: anyone see noticeable MPG gains with 195's over 205's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 01-25-2012, 01:00 PM
Stanislaus's Avatar
Stanislaus
Stanislaus is offline
4th Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Athens, GA
Posts: 545
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tires: anyone see noticeable MPG gains with 195's over 205's

I'm about to order a new set of tires for my 2003 cooper. I currently have 205/50/16's and I like how they look, but it seems like I'd lose about 6 pounds per tire going back to 195's. Seems like there's a benefit there. Any thoughts on this? I've been reading tire threads on NAM for a couple days, but haven't read about this specific question.
Would I see significant MPG or any other gains, or would the difference be negligible?
I'd also be interested to hear whether anyone went to 195s and hated the looks of them...
 
  #2  
Old 01-26-2012, 03:22 AM
Autobot_Lazi's Avatar
Autobot_Lazi
Autobot_Lazi is offline
1st Gear
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
its not worth the trouble. verry verrrry minimal. Just buy the tire that you like the best. what ever looks the best on your car. what ever you are most comfortable with.

also a take on how the tires look- I like smaller tires on cars that are lowered. It makes the wheels look bigger adn allows the wheels to stand out. But if you are at factory height then maybe the bigger wheel so it can fill out that wheel well and make the car look more balanced. your car would look wider with the wider wheels
 
  #3  
Old 01-26-2012, 04:45 AM
yetti96's Avatar
yetti96
yetti96 is offline
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Ave Maria, FL
Posts: 3,031
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
I saw a slight increase in mileage going from the 205 to a 195. I miss the grip though, with the 195s they seem to squeak and let go. The 205s were a different type of tire too but they held on and as I turned my face kept going the original direction.
 
  #4  
Old 01-26-2012, 04:54 AM
Stanislaus's Avatar
Stanislaus
Stanislaus is offline
4th Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Athens, GA
Posts: 545
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks, guys! Trying to squeeze a little more MPG but if it's just a tiny difference I'll stick to the 205's. Yetti96, pretty small gain? Do you recall how much?
 
  #5  
Old 01-26-2012, 05:29 AM
jcauseyfd's Avatar
jcauseyfd
jcauseyfd is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Graham, NC
Posts: 2,358
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
When I went from 195s to 205s I lost about 1.5 mpg (roughly a 5% decrease). That was also a switch from RFT to non-RFT and from A/S to Summer. I recently switched from Summer back to A/S (but still 205) and have not noticed any impact on mpg.
 
  #6  
Old 01-26-2012, 05:35 AM
drsimmons's Avatar
drsimmons
drsimmons is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Robertsdale, Alabama
Posts: 1,961
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm with everyone else, went from 195 to 205's and just a slight difference in mileage. Not enough to want me to go back to the 195's. I like the looks and the handling much better.
 
  #7  
Old 01-26-2012, 11:26 AM
Jim Michaels's Avatar
Jim Michaels
Jim Michaels is offline
5th Gear
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Blacksburg, VA
Posts: 772
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Six pounds per tire difference? The info I saw at Tire Rack shows the same tires in 195/55/16 and 205/50/16 sizes to be only about 1 pound different (often 20# versus 21#) in weight for most tires. It makes sense that they're so close in weight because the 205/50/16 is a little wider (rubber gained), but also a little smaller in diameter (rubber lost) than the 195/55/16.

As others have suggested, I don't think the switch would be a very effective way to increase mpg.
 
  #8  
Old 01-26-2012, 12:56 PM
Stanislaus's Avatar
Stanislaus
Stanislaus is offline
4th Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Athens, GA
Posts: 545
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jim, thanks for the reply. I think you're right about the closeness there, though I wonder how the rolling resistance varies.
Most of the tires I've looked at only have about a pound worth of weight difference between those types, but I was going by a comparison using this handy site:
http://www.rimsntires.com/specs.jsp
Which has an estimated weight difference of 4 lbs per tire (not six, as I originally posted).
 
  #9  
Old 01-26-2012, 04:37 PM
Jim Michaels's Avatar
Jim Michaels
Jim Michaels is offline
5th Gear
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Blacksburg, VA
Posts: 772
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I used that site link as well, but when I did, it showed no weight difference using those two tire sizes. It says typical tire weight is about 20# for both sizes. Just to make sure we're typing in the same data, I typed in a 195/55/16 on a 6.5" wide wheel with et48 and a 205/50/16 on the same wheel.

I got the tire weights data from Tire Rack, however. For example, a RE760 tire weighs 20# in the 195/55/16 size and 21# in the 205/50/16 size. The GMAXAS 03 tire weighs 18# and 19# in those sizes, and the Yoko ENVigor weighs 21# in both sizes.

The rolling resistance of the wider tire should be slightly more, but the difference should be very small because the tire width increase is only 10 mm (about 3/8"). With such a small difference one could probably equalize the rolling resistance of the two by inflating the wider tire by a few more psi. I'm just guessing, so don't hold me to that.

As others have suggested, the narrower size probably does give slightly more mpg in the real world. The question is whether the very small mpg gain is worth giving up some of what you like about the 205 size.
 
  #10  
Old 01-26-2012, 04:49 PM
Stanislaus's Avatar
Stanislaus
Stanislaus is offline
4th Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Athens, GA
Posts: 545
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, you're right- I didn't check to see if the dropdown for rim size matched on tire #2.
That makes the job of choosing easier; I can stick to aesthetics and purchase the wider tires. Thanks again.
 
  #11  
Old 01-27-2012, 04:59 AM
yetti96's Avatar
yetti96
yetti96 is offline
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Ave Maria, FL
Posts: 3,031
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Stanislaus
Thanks, guys! Trying to squeeze a little more MPG but if it's just a tiny difference I'll stick to the 205's. Yetti96, pretty small gain? Do you recall how much?
Not enough to care, I just got a great deal on the 195s so I jumped on it and put my 2 best used 192s from the original 16s from my other MINI on the back. I would probably buy 205s if I do it again, just like I went from 195s on my MCS (16" wheel) to the 205s (17" wheel) and will replace them with 215s when it is time for tires.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
potterstein
R56 :: Hatch Talk (2007+)
10
02-23-2016 12:06 PM
HogWldFLTR
F55/F56 :: Hatch Talk (2014+)
3
09-08-2015 05:25 AM
dandw2
MINIs & Minis for Sale
0
09-07-2015 11:14 AM
potterstein
Stock Problems/Issues
1
09-04-2015 09:52 AM



Quick Reply: R50/53 Tires: anyone see noticeable MPG gains with 195's over 205's



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:22 PM.