R50/53 How many miles did your stock shocks last?
#1
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Hollywood, FL
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How many miles did your stock shocks last?
My wife's car is at 152k miles and we bought it at 67k miles in 2008. I don't think the shocks were replaced before we bought it so with a rough ride compaired to my R55 I'm thinking the shocks are the reason. I'd like to know how many miles factory shocks are supposed to get before replacement.
#2
My guess is that your shocks are well worn out.
From what I've read, the OE MINI shocks are a weak point; they're not very good even before they're worn. Thus, some owners don't wait long before switching to Koni shocks.
You may appreciate the Koni FSD shocks; improved handling and a better ride over OE shocks.
From what I've read, the OE MINI shocks are a weak point; they're not very good even before they're worn. Thus, some owners don't wait long before switching to Koni shocks.
You may appreciate the Koni FSD shocks; improved handling and a better ride over OE shocks.
#4
I would suspect they would wear out quicker if you have lowering springs..
Also, not exactly sure if you can compare the ride quality of an R53 to an R55. I don't believe they use the same dampers. Also, differences in tire's (run flats vs non run flats), or wheel size will also affect ride quality. ...you may be comparing apples to oranges and hunting for something that's not there..
Also, not exactly sure if you can compare the ride quality of an R53 to an R55. I don't believe they use the same dampers. Also, differences in tire's (run flats vs non run flats), or wheel size will also affect ride quality. ...you may be comparing apples to oranges and hunting for something that's not there..
Last edited by ERIK06MCS; 07-05-2012 at 11:43 AM. Reason: apples to *oranges
#5
And honestly, if you don't see wet residue around the shocks nor hear clunking over bumps, then there really wouldn't be any sign of them being worn/defective.
There really is no set mileage to replace your shocks, and when they wear, the ride will not become more harsh, but rather more bouncy. The shocks themselves absorb the oscillations of the spring. You'll know a car with blown shocks when you see one- it's the car that's driving down the street that looks like it's bouncing on hydraulics from a bump it hit a block ago
Springs are what mostly determine the stiffness of the ride, and I would suspect your R53 has stiffer springs than your R55. But again, visually inspect the shocks and if there is no oily residue, nor any clunking coming from the suspension over bumps, there's no reason to suspect your shocks need replaced.
Mileage is all relative to the roads you drive on and how hard you're driving on them.
There really is no set mileage to replace your shocks, and when they wear, the ride will not become more harsh, but rather more bouncy. The shocks themselves absorb the oscillations of the spring. You'll know a car with blown shocks when you see one- it's the car that's driving down the street that looks like it's bouncing on hydraulics from a bump it hit a block ago
Springs are what mostly determine the stiffness of the ride, and I would suspect your R53 has stiffer springs than your R55. But again, visually inspect the shocks and if there is no oily residue, nor any clunking coming from the suspension over bumps, there's no reason to suspect your shocks need replaced.
Mileage is all relative to the roads you drive on and how hard you're driving on them.
#6
#7
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Hollywood, FL
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Erik, I know that an R53 and R55 aren't the same, but comparing stock suspensions on 17's and 18's (they don't make that much of a difference) with strut bars I figured the ride wouldn't differ that much. The R55 has had H&R springs and a rear swaybar until last week and it was a smoother ride before and after going back to stock. I'll also be checking bushings as this car has seen northern winters, and driven all types of roads so I imagine that any rubber under the car is deteriorating. The R55 has 57k miles vs 152k on the R53. I know what blown shocks look, feel and sound like and there's no evidence of that. Springs handle the weight of the car whereas the shocks smooth out the movement and take out the harshness of the ride. The R53 just transmits so much of the road feel that I never realized it so much until I started going back and forth between the 2 cars. I'm certain the shocks have just surpassed their lifespan, but we'll see if replacing them does much.
Jeff & daflake, that's good info, thanks!
Jeff & daflake, that's good info, thanks!
Trending Topics
#10
They were not leaking, or otherwise visually "worn", but their performance was nowhere near when i bought my car new.....
i would guess with a typical nitrogen/oil strut, the viscosity of the oil changes over time from tge sheering action related to the valving....so they can look perfect, but ride bad!!
#11
#12
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
igzekyativ
MINIs & Minis for Sale
34
07-16-2020 12:54 PM
phrza81
MINIs & Minis for Sale
9
10-10-2015 11:37 PM
ltjpunk7
MINI Parts for Sale
2
09-06-2015 07:32 AM