R56 07 Now or wait for 08?
#27
WOW! Much to consider.. I was originally asking about word on a chrono package. If there are no rumors of it being offered, how hard is it to get and install aftermarket guages that will tell me oil pressure and temp (and boost?)? How close to OEM could it look
Being new to this lingo... What is the CEL issue mentioned for early '07s?
I'd love the mileage increase with the start/stop and alternator options, but unless it is a sure thing... I won't wait a whole nother year for it.
I was able to order the OEM alarm last week.
Being new to this lingo... What is the CEL issue mentioned for early '07s?
I'd love the mileage increase with the start/stop and alternator options, but unless it is a sure thing... I won't wait a whole nother year for it.
I was able to order the OEM alarm last week.
Last edited by Mini2na; 06-28-2007 at 10:11 AM.
#28
#29
Here it looks like the most common reason stated on why we should wait for the '08 is, maybe there will be some tweaks that will make the car even better yet.
That's a big change in voiced opinions in just 6 months. It says a lot for this new car.
I got one of the first ones. So far, no problems, issues, squeaks, or rattles as I now approach the 6,000 mile mark.
Go for it.
#31
#32
#35
#36
I'm planning to wait until JCW parts are factory options, hopefully in 2008. However, I'm fearful that DSC will become standard in 2008 (US gov't is mandating it for MY2009) and/or will be required with factory ordered JCW power kits, and I absolutely don't want DSC.
Just like the sport mode, you could probably wire a circuit up around it.
#37
JCW factory installed in 08. I doubt it. There is too much added profit for MINI dealer. Go back and look at the history of R53 and JCW and you will find the dealer getting three years worth of profit before MINI created JCW as a factory option. I think the same will be true with the R56.
#38
JCW factory installed in 08. I doubt it. There is too much added profit for MINI dealer. Go back and look at the history of R53 and JCW and you will find the dealer getting three years worth of profit before MINI created JCW as a factory option. I think the same will be true with the R56.
I think you may see the JCW factory install sooner...in the 2009 model year either as a JCW separate model or in a performance package as part of the stage II upgrade.
#39
I don't want to hit the switch whenever I drive the car, and I don't want to mess with the electrical to defeat it. I just want the car to be without the electronic nanny.
#40
JCW factory installed in 08. I doubt it. There is too much added profit for MINI dealer. Go back and look at the history of R53 and JCW and you will find the dealer getting three years worth of profit before MINI created JCW as a factory option. I think the same will be true with the R56.
#41
#45
I suppose seat belts are a bad thing as well..
*muttering* darn safety devices...all I want to do is meet Darwin!
(tongue in cheek here)
#46
Hydraulic brakes provided even distribution of braking force to each wheel (a nanny) but it was still necessary to periodically adjust the distance between brake pad and drum.
Self adjusting brakes came along next. All you had to do was do a quick drive in reverse then slam on your brakes. Your brakes were now adjusted (another nanny).
Then, not too long ago, we got automatic adjusting brakes meaning there was no longer any necessity for the driver to do anything at all to keep the brakes adjusted (another nanny yet).
Still, if we had to slam on our brakes, we could not, in any way, maneuver our car out of trouble. The car would simply slide along to wherever momentum took it. Then came the automatic braking system (ABS) that, if you braked hard, the brakes would pulse in such a way as to allow your car to be maneuvered as you stood on your brakes. Also, in keeping the skid from happening the car would stop over a significantly shorter distance (another Nanny).
Then stability control came along (DSC in our car). This is an extension of ABS that will brake a single wheel if your car isn't going in the direction you're telling it to (for instance as a result of your having to make a quick maneuver in order to avoid an object suddenly appearing on the highway). It analyzes the situation then brakes exactly the right wheel just enough to make your car do what your steering wheel is telling it to do (yet another nanny). On our car though, because some folks race them and often want the rear end to slide out to some driver controlled degree, there's a DSC disable switch.
Heck, there's even another nanny that, if it's detected that you're braking in an emergency, will add even more force to assure you stop in the quickest possible time.
These are just some of the braking nannies. There are all kinds of mechanical, hydraulic, electrical, and electronic nannies on every single car manufactured (it's nice, for instance, to have that cushiony nanny jump out in front of you as your car is crashing into another - the air bag). You can't get away from them. Of course the fact that you can't means there are fewer severely disabled former drivers, and more drivers around who would otherwise be dead, all saved by the nannies on our cars.
#49
#50
JohnBLZ, Ken Cooper (some free time on your hands?), LynEl, rattmobbins, and anybody else compelled to criticize those that don't want DSC...this isn't a vintage Porsche 911 or Corvair with a tendency to oversteer. A FWD car with sticky tires and relatively low horsepower is not hard to control, especially for those of us in dry climates (those without the ability should enroll in a HPDE course ASAP). However, BMW's DSC systems are extremely conservative (note it's one of three items listed in C&D's 'cons' column in its Mini comparison) and, IMO from four years with an E46 M3, unsafe when engine power is cut abruptly in completely benign situations.