R56 TPMS SENSORS... BYPASS?
#1
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
TPMS SENSORS... BYPASS?
I just put on my summer/fall wheels 18" JCW R113's and kept my original TPMS sensors in my my stock 16" s winders and wanted to know if there is any way to cut the switch or bypass the senors so i can get that annoying little light from flashing as well as the exclamation point on my tach....
I have an 2008 MCS!!
thanks guys!
I have an 2008 MCS!!
thanks guys!
#6
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#7
Trending Topics
#8
I kind of like the stupid sensors, I worry much less about the tire pressures now. I hope I'm not putting unwarranted trust in this system.
#9
I hate the TPMS sensors, it's just another way to spend money and increase the cost of vehicles. I feel the safety issues and gas savings because of them are insignificant compared to the $300 or more they tach on to the price of new cars. I think simple cars will cost less and run longer. Too many gadgets are bad :(
I just don't think it's that difficult to visually check your tires every time you fill up w/ gas. Or check w/ a gauge every 6 months or so. ..anyway, we all have our opinions I guess.
I just don't think it's that difficult to visually check your tires every time you fill up w/ gas. Or check w/ a gauge every 6 months or so. ..anyway, we all have our opinions I guess.
#11
I hate the TPMS sensors, it's just another way to spend money and increase the cost of vehicles. I feel the safety issues and gas savings because of them are insignificant compared to the $300 or more they tach on to the price of new cars. I think simple cars will cost less and run longer. Too many gadgets are bad :(
I just don't think it's that difficult to visually check your tires every time you fill up w/ gas. Or check w/ a gauge every 6 months or so. ..anyway, we all have our opinions I guess.
I just don't think it's that difficult to visually check your tires every time you fill up w/ gas. Or check w/ a gauge every 6 months or so. ..anyway, we all have our opinions I guess.
I prefer the old method of using the ABS sensor. which allowed you to change wheels and not worry about this "sensor" shenanigans
#14
The logic
or lack thereof, of TPMS is that a very large percentage of car drivers never check thier pressures, no matter how easy it is. This is coupled with low tire pressures contributing to roll-over accidents, which are the most lethal type. So you make sure that there's a way for the average driver to know that the tires need air, and hence cut down on the number of fatal roll over accidents.
The TPMS could easily be capable of reporting absolute pressures, but it doesn't give this info to the driver yet.... I'm sure higher end cars will soon.
And the $300 cost is retail to replace the sensor. For the cost in a new car it's much, much less. FWIW, the sensors are rebuildable, but are not standardized. So getting the right parts to change the seals and the like isn't easy....
Matt
The TPMS could easily be capable of reporting absolute pressures, but it doesn't give this info to the driver yet.... I'm sure higher end cars will soon.
And the $300 cost is retail to replace the sensor. For the cost in a new car it's much, much less. FWIW, the sensors are rebuildable, but are not standardized. So getting the right parts to change the seals and the like isn't easy....
Matt
#15
#16
It's the exact same reasoning...
as to why we have manditory seatbelts, collapsable steering columns, air bags and ABS systems. Same for headlights, turn signals and brake lights. Some of these items we all (I hope) like, some not so much so....
I haven't yet seen data as to if they are effective in reducing roll-over accident rate as intended. If they do, what's the problem? If they don't, then it's a waste of money.
Matt
ps, if you think that gov isn't representing your interests, vote differently! If the interest doesn't carry the day, that called "democracy".... Get used to it!
I haven't yet seen data as to if they are effective in reducing roll-over accident rate as intended. If they do, what's the problem? If they don't, then it's a waste of money.
Matt
ps, if you think that gov isn't representing your interests, vote differently! If the interest doesn't carry the day, that called "democracy".... Get used to it!
#17
4th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just found this:
http://tiptopvi.ehost.com/tpms/
I would have to think there would be cheaper ways, but depending on how it works this could prevent you from ever having to buy the stupid sensors. If that was the case it might be worth it. Too bad there is no info.
http://tiptopvi.ehost.com/tpms/
I would have to think there would be cheaper ways, but depending on how it works this could prevent you from ever having to buy the stupid sensors. If that was the case it might be worth it. Too bad there is no info.
#18
The trouble with that is it was quite insensitve, it really only tells you about flats, not low pressure. I only got a warning with the old method when the tires were down 11lb, down about 1/3 of the ideal pressure. I could have been driving around for weeks on a 10lb down tire and it wouldn't warn me. I'm pretty sure 10lb down is not good for the tire.
#19
as to why we have mandatory seat belts, collapsible steering columns, air bags and ABS systems. Same for headlights, turn signals and brake lights. Some of these items we all (I hope) like, some not so much so....
I haven't yet seen data as to if they are effective in reducing roll-over accident rate as intended. If they do, what's the problem? If they don't, then it's a waste of money.
Matt
PS, if you think that gov isn't representing your interests, vote differently! If the interest doesn't carry the day, that called "democracy".... Get used to it!
I haven't yet seen data as to if they are effective in reducing roll-over accident rate as intended. If they do, what's the problem? If they don't, then it's a waste of money.
Matt
PS, if you think that gov isn't representing your interests, vote differently! If the interest doesn't carry the day, that called "democracy".... Get used to it!
#20
I'm betting...
Just found this:
http://tiptopvi.ehost.com/tpms/
I would have to think there would be cheaper ways, but depending on how it works this could prevent you from ever having to buy the stupid sensors. If that was the case it might be worth it. Too bad there is no info.
http://tiptopvi.ehost.com/tpms/
I would have to think there would be cheaper ways, but depending on how it works this could prevent you from ever having to buy the stupid sensors. If that was the case it might be worth it. Too bad there is no info.
The reason the wheel speed sensor lost out is it's a relative measure, not absolute. So you can just press the reset button and go around with low pressures (as I'm sure many do, or did).
Sensitivity is an issue in programming, more than anything else. Mine went off at about 5-7 lbs low on one tire.
Matt
#23
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Southern California (562)
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
tirerack sells 4 replacement sensors for 200$. they come in two pieces the sensor/transmitter and the valve stem itself. it comes out to like 32$ per each sensor/transmitter and ~18$ for each valve stem: not too bad if you break it down like that
Tire rack sells them thru ebay
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/BMW-M...spagenameZWDVW
Tire rack sells them thru ebay
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/BMW-M...spagenameZWDVW
#24
4th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/show...p?p=1566632157
looks like the corvettes appreciate it
I sure hope our car doesn't do something stupid like that.
looks like the corvettes appreciate it
I sure hope our car doesn't do something stupid like that.