R56 :: Hatch Talk (2007+) MINI Cooper and Cooper S (R56) hatchback discussion.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

R56 Timing Chain Class action Lawsuit Settled?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 11-24-2015, 03:34 PM
shark715's Avatar
shark715
shark715 is offline
6th Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: north/central New Jersey
Posts: 1,296
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Timing Chain Class action Lawsuit Settled?

Looks like BMW has agreed to pay Plaintiffs attorneys $1.8 Million. I'm trying to ascertain what thew owners get.

http://www.law360.com/classaction/ar...gn=classaction
 
  #2  
Old 11-24-2015, 04:55 PM
05r50's Avatar
05r50
05r50 is offline
5th Gear
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Hilliard, Ohio
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Little more info on motoring alliance.

Extension of warranty coverage and some payback for prior repair costs.
 
  #3  
Old 12-01-2015, 05:03 PM
shark715's Avatar
shark715
shark715 is offline
6th Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: north/central New Jersey
Posts: 1,296
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
More details:
BMW of North America LLC has agreed to settle a class action lawsuit over allegations that certain Mini Cooper models contain an engine defect.

The BMW class action lawsuit filed by Joshua Skeen and Laurie Freeman alleges that Mini Cooper S Hardtops, Clubmans and Convertibles between the model years 2007 to 2010 have a timing chain problem that costs vehicle owners thousands of dollars to repair.

According to the BMW class action lawsuit, the Mini Cooper’s timing chain tensioner is off-sync, which forces the engine to work harder at the expense of the engine’s pistons and valves. In some cases, the alleged engine defect reportedly caused the entire vehicle to lose power.

Skeen and Freeman say they each purchased a new Mini Cooper S in 2007 and were told that the timing chains were supposed to last about 10 years or 120,000 miles. However, the plaintiffs claim they had to make costly repairs much sooner than anticipated.

In 2013, Skeen claims to have paid more than $3,000 to replace the BMW car engine that had 74,000 miles on it. In a similar situation, Freeman says the timing chain tensioner on her Mini Cooper was replaced under warranty in 2009 but failed again in 2013 costing her $1,300.

The BMW engine class action lawsuit claims that the car manufacturer has been aware of the engine defect since 2008 when they acknowledged the problem by issuing a technical service bulletin. However, the plaintiffs say that although the company knew about the issue they did not offer to reimburse BMW car owners for the repair.

If approved, the BMW class action settlement will reimburse Class Members 100 percent of the cost of repairing or replacing the timing chain tensioner at an authorized MINI dealer. In addition, the BMW settlement would extend the four year or 50,000 mile warranty to seven years or 100,000 miles.

The proposed BMW engine defect class action settlement was reached after more than a year of negotiations, followed by a full-day mediation between both parties.
 
  #4  
Old 12-01-2015, 05:55 PM
hidperf's Avatar
hidperf
hidperf is offline
3rd Gear
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 208
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by shark715
If approved, the BMW class action settlement will reimburse Class Members 100 percent of the cost of repairing or replacing the timing chain tensioner at an authorized MINI dealer. In addition, the BMW settlement would extend the four year or 50,000 mile warranty to seven years or 100,000 miles.
"If approved"

I also wonder if the extended warranty covers just the timing chain components. I can't imagine them extending the entire warranty.
 
  #5  
Old 12-01-2015, 08:20 PM
gchin's Avatar
gchin
gchin is offline
2nd Gear
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Elk Grove, CA
Posts: 105
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
How do we become part of the Class Lawsuit recipients?
 
  #6  
Old 12-01-2015, 10:33 PM
Minnie.the.Moocher's Avatar
Minnie.the.Moocher
Minnie.the.Moocher is offline
OVERDRIVE
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: earth PNW
Posts: 5,390
Received 571 Likes on 487 Posts
Originally Posted by gchin
How do we become part of the Class Lawsuit recipients?
usually the class is defined by the court, you need to read the documents. More than likely you would be included, unless you specifically opted out.
 
  #7  
Old 12-02-2015, 07:04 AM
shark715's Avatar
shark715
shark715 is offline
6th Gear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: north/central New Jersey
Posts: 1,296
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by hidperf
"If approved"

I also wonder if the extended warranty covers just the timing chain components. I can't imagine them extending the entire warranty.
Are you really concerned that the court won't approve this settlement? Difficult to imagine why that would not happen.

Yes, the extended warranty only covers the specified parts, not the rest of the engine, and definitely not the entire car.
 
  #8  
Old 12-02-2015, 09:16 PM
gjxj's Avatar
gjxj
gjxj is offline
4th Gear
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
"in addition to replacing" (the tensioner) .. "would extend the warranty". Not clear exactly what that means but it sounds like they are extending the warranty on something more than just the tensioner.
 
  #9  
Old 12-02-2015, 09:20 PM
hidperf's Avatar
hidperf
hidperf is offline
3rd Gear
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 208
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by gjxj
"in addition to replacing" (the tensioner) .. "would extend the warranty". Not clear exactly what that means but it sounds like they are extending the warranty on something more than just the tensioner.
That was my point. Not a lot of REAL information.

Probably way early in the process to know anything for sure.
 
  #10  
Old 02-23-2016, 03:33 AM
bettehead's Avatar
bettehead
bettehead is offline
3rd Gear
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 242
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Notice received in snail mail yesterday: Timing chain lawsuit

Hi, folks.

Yesterday I came home to a letter with a form asking if I wanted to join the lawsuit.

Has anyone else received one of these? I haven't had a chance to read it thoroughly enough but if you don't have service documents, there is an affadavit for a mechanic to sign attesting to the routine maintenance of the MINI.

I am the original owner of a 2009 Mini Cooper S.
 
  #11  
Old 02-23-2016, 04:53 AM
gjxj's Avatar
gjxj
gjxj is offline
4th Gear
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
did the note give a deadline to respond?
 
  #12  
Old 02-23-2016, 04:58 AM
Redhotz's Avatar
Redhotz
Redhotz is offline
2nd Gear
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 135
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
June 20, 2016 is the deadline to respond. I just got mine yesterday also.



Originally Posted by gjxj
did the note give a deadline to respond?
 
  #13  
Old 02-23-2016, 10:22 AM
R56BrgMcs's Avatar
R56BrgMcs
R56BrgMcs is offline
4th Gear
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Spokane, Wa. it's not near Seattle
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
too bad they aren't forced to buy back all mini's because of this...mine would be gone in a heart beat.
 
  #14  
Old 02-23-2016, 11:32 AM
jontalk's Avatar
jontalk
jontalk is offline
2nd Gear
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Am curious why the the 2010 MCS hardtop isn't included in the law suit since it has the same engine as the convertible.. Anyone know the answer?
 
  #15  
Old 02-23-2016, 11:41 AM
RDMMINI's Avatar
RDMMINI
RDMMINI is offline
Neutral
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I received a letter in the mail yesterday to file for the settlement.
 
  #16  
Old 02-23-2016, 12:06 PM
broncobuddha's Avatar
broncobuddha
broncobuddha is offline
3rd Gear
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 234
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I need to read up more on this. I got an email today about it.

I've got a 09' Clubman S, but I'm not the original owner and the car was just out of the factory warranty (by years not mileage) when I got it. It had 48k on it. I researched the history and a MINI dealer replaced the timing chain in my car at 34k miles.

It's now got over 70k. No idea if they upgraded the tensioner.
 
  #17  
Old 02-23-2016, 12:11 PM
mrcarson2's Avatar
mrcarson2
mrcarson2 is offline
Neutral
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had my tensioner and chain on my 2008 S replaced last fall and paid out of pocket. In the letter, it mentions that you have to provide proof that you had adhered to the required maintenance. I did all my own oil changes, however. There is a section to get a mechanic, either MINI or 3rd party to sign off on it. Do you think I can just sign off as I did the work myself? I have since sold the car since it was becoming too expensive to maintain, but would like reimbursed since this was a common problem.
 
  #18  
Old 02-23-2016, 01:00 PM
broncobuddha's Avatar
broncobuddha
broncobuddha is offline
3rd Gear
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 234
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And I'm unsure about some of the language. It mentions, even if you do nothing, you'll be given an extended warranty of 7 years/100k miles from the Coverage Vehicle's "in-service" date.

What do they mean by in-service? Is that the build date? If so, hell I'm at 7 years now, which would make the warranty useless to me.
 
  #19  
Old 02-23-2016, 02:04 PM
cjny's Avatar
cjny
cjny is offline
2nd Gear
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jontalk
Am curious why the the 2010 MCS hardtop isn't included in the law suit since it has the same engine as the convertible.. Anyone know the answer?
This is a good question. I own a 2010 model yr MCS hardtop that appears to be excluded. Inexplicably, I just received the letter. One of the options in responding is to tell the court why you don't like the settlement. I intend to complain about the exclusion of the 2010 MCS hardtop. It may do no good but it's probably going to be my only opportunity to make the case.

I'm on my 3rd tensioner, and the last one was paid for by me. Plus my chain is stretched beyond the spec described in the TSB so it seems like just a matter of time before I have to change the whole thing.
 
  #20  
Old 02-23-2016, 02:23 PM
Systemlord's Avatar
Systemlord
Systemlord is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 3,428
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 34 Posts
An in service date on a vehicle is when the original car warranty started on the vehicle when it was first purchased as a new vehicle. The in service date should not be confused with when the vehicle was originally manufactured, instead think of the in service date as the date that the first consumer drove the vehicle off the dealerships parking lot.

So if your car was sat on the dealer lot a year before it was purchased your warranty starts then.
 
  #21  
Old 02-23-2016, 02:40 PM
jontalk's Avatar
jontalk
jontalk is offline
2nd Gear
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cjny
This is a good question. I own a 2010 model yr MCS hardtop that appears to be excluded. Inexplicably, I just received the letter. One of the options in responding is to tell the court why you don't like the settlement. I intend to complain about the exclusion of the 2010 MCS hardtop. It may do no good but it's probably going to be my only opportunity to make the case.

I'm on my 3rd tensioner, and the last one was paid for by me. Plus my chain is stretched beyond the spec described in the TSB so it seems like just a matter of time before I have to change the whole thing.
Seriously? You're on the THIRD tensioner now? Am curious if you monitored the oil levels and topped off when low since you've owned the car. I was looking at one like yours with 54K miles that never had it done, and decided against it due to the major problems with this engine. And as I said I find it VERY odd they don't include hardtops since around here in the SF area there are 20 hardtops to every convertible.. And based on what you say here it's obviously the SAME engine too!
 
  #22  
Old 02-23-2016, 03:00 PM
Systemlord's Avatar
Systemlord
Systemlord is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 3,428
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 34 Posts
For those that own an MCS I can't stress enough how important it is that you install the 5th final designed tensioner, it's so much smoother than any gen design before it as I had a rare opportunity to test a 3rd gen, 4th gen and 5th gen tensioner and it's night and day difference! The older gen tensioners were all the same even before installing new, the piston was anything but smooth which as you may or may not know is the reason why the tensioner gets stuck partially open not fully tensioning the timing chain which causes it to stretch and by the time it starts hitting the upper guide it's to late.

It took Mini 8 years to get it right, way to long for any manufacture!
 
  #23  
Old 02-23-2016, 06:03 PM
Bob's Your Uncle's Avatar
Bob's Your Uncle
Bob's Your Uncle is offline
Neutral
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by broncobuddha
And I'm unsure about some of the language. It mentions, even if you do nothing, you'll be given an extended warranty of 7 years/100k miles from the Coverage Vehicle's "in-service" date.

What do they mean by in-service? Is that the build date? If so, hell I'm at 7 years now, which would make the warranty useless to me.
That's my question as well. My 07 is now over 8 years old...so what, I'm getting an expired free meal voucher to Cracker Barrel as my reward? Basically, it sounds like they're trying to clear the outstanding costs owners had trying to fix their own cars, but the extended warranty for the rest of us is meaningless. Add 7 years into the original warranty, and maybe I'll start caring.
 

Last edited by Bob's Your Uncle; 02-24-2016 at 12:27 AM.
  #24  
Old 02-23-2016, 11:26 PM
eliseo1981's Avatar
eliseo1981
eliseo1981 is offline
2nd Gear
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Systemlord
For those that own an MCS I can't stress enough how important it is that you install the 5th final designed tensioner, it's so much smoother than any gen design before it as I had a rare opportunity to test a 3rd gen, 4th gen and 5th gen tensioner and it's night and day difference! The older gen tensioners were all the same even before installing new, the piston was anything but smooth which as you may or may not know is the reason why the tensioner gets stuck partially open not fully tensioning the timing chain which causes it to stretch and by the time it starts hitting the upper guide it's to late.

It took Mini 8 years to get it right, way to long for any manufacture!
Where did you get the fifth generation tensioner? Can you post pictures of it, I got a new tensioner from the dealer, not sure if it was the new one.
 
  #25  
Old 02-24-2016, 01:23 AM
Systemlord's Avatar
Systemlord
Systemlord is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 3,428
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 34 Posts
Originally Posted by eliseo1981
Where did you get the fifth generation tensioner? Can you post pictures of it, I got a new tensioner from the dealer, not sure if it was the new one.
Got it at a Mini dealer when I went in to have my chain slack measured before my 2 year warranty was up. The newer one doesn't have a dimple in the center, most places don't even sell the older generations anymore, only the longer tensioners.
 


Quick Reply: R56 Timing Chain Class action Lawsuit Settled?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:08 AM.