R56 60-0?
#1
05-02-2007, 12:02 PM
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#2
05-02-2007, 12:53 PM
2nd Gear
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
stopping distance
Road and track put it at 122 feet from 60 MPH. See the attached
http://www.roadandtrack.com/assets/d...pockets_dp.pdf
http://www.roadandtrack.com/assets/d...pockets_dp.pdf
#4
05-02-2007, 01:33 PM
#5
05-02-2007, 01:47 PM
6th Gear
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: home
Posts: 2,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MINI is a lighter car that boasts good performance. Brake fade is something people talk about at the tracks. IMO, for the the everyday life situations, how far you travel after applying the brakes in an emergency situation is more critical. And that is why the car magazines print stopping distance. They comment on brake fade if they testdrive the car on the track because some readers expect them to. If the mag. writers only did on-street testdrives, some or many people won't take that particular mag seriously. What % of MINI owners go on the track?
Last edited by r56mini; 06-17-2008 at 11:23 AM.
#6
05-02-2007, 01:54 PM
MINI is a lighter car that boasts good performance. Brake fade is something people talk about at the tracks. IMO, for the the everyday life situations, how far you travel after applying the brakes in an emergency situation is more critical. And that is why the car magazines print stopping distance. They comment on brake fade if they testdrive the car on the track because some readers expect them to. If the mag. writers only did on-street testdrives, some or many people won't take that particular mag seriously. What % of MINI owners go on the track? In autoX, track pads don't work because the pads don't heat up as much. So the initial bite is more important for autoX and street.
If the R56 distance is more than the Mazda and it has the JCW brakes ... not so good if thats important. I have no idea what a really great number may be but I do remember, for example, MR2 numbers were 98 feet. I only remember because it was one of the few cars to break 100 feet.
If you drive hot in the twisties, brake fade can be very real ... and not fun.
#7
05-02-2007, 02:16 PM
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Trending Topics
#8
05-02-2007, 02:36 PM
#9
05-02-2007, 02:39 PM
6th Gear
Did that article mention brake fade on the MINI as a problem? Anyone have fade problems at the Dragon? Or is it still too early for that?
Doesn't the braking distance have a lot to do with the tires? If you look at the tests on tirerack.com you find considerable variation between tires on one car.
Doesn't the braking distance have a lot to do with the tires? If you look at the tests on tirerack.com you find considerable variation between tires on one car.
#10
05-02-2007, 03:04 PM
5th Gear
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Elyria, Ohio
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If we are talking about one 60-0 stop and not repeated stops; there is zero performance advantage in the larger R56 (or R53 JCW) brakes over the smaller stock R53 brakes. The smaller brakes have more than ample stopping power to invoke lockup (ABS kicks in) even on hot sticky race tires- available tire friction is the limiting factor in this equation. Now, if we want to start talking repeated heavy braking application, the extra mass of the larger brakes will be an advantage by being less prone to fade.
Jason
Jason
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ljmattox
General MINI Talk
14
02-10-2012 07:47 PM
irishpunk
Tires, Wheels, & Brakes
15
10-22-2011 09:02 AM
BostonR56S
Stock Problems/Issues
1
01-28-2009 05:52 PM