Stock Problems/Issues Discussions related to warranty related issues and repairs, or other problems with the OEM parts and software for MINI Clubman (R55), Cooper and Cooper S(R56), and Cabrio (R57).

Cold start chatter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1551  
Old 02-10-2010, 04:04 PM
Robin Casady's Avatar
Robin Casady
Robin Casady is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Paradise
Posts: 7,578
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by bdn
The techs are saying that the chain broke because the engine was over-revved something around 6700rpm right before engine shut down. [Data from DME]
So, were you at or over redline when the engine died? Had you just downshifted, or at WOT?

Since the timing chain problem is well known, unless you really were abusing the car, MINI should cover this.

Did you not know about the issue when you drove it for a week with the noise?
 
  #1552  
Old 02-11-2010, 02:50 PM
ENGINE 58's Avatar
ENGINE 58
ENGINE 58 is offline
5th Gear
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: florida
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I took mine in for the csc and a cel. I called today and they told me it's the wastegate. Hum ? I know what the cold start chatter sounds like , my 07 mcs had it. I'm not liking this.
 
  #1553  
Old 02-12-2010, 06:46 AM
Fcal124's Avatar
Fcal124
Fcal124 is offline
2nd Gear
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by wildcrazy442000
Even if you don't have the timing chain issue, the Prince is a noisy beast of a engine.
You ain't kidding!
I thought I was getting the rattle, but it lasted too long and wasn't as harsh. It turned out to be noise made by the vacuum pump. I disconnected the vacuum hose and the noise disappeared, put the hose back on, and the noise is back. After the car warms up, it's still there, but not as bad.
Gotta turn up the stereo and get a louder exhaust
 
  #1554  
Old 02-12-2010, 09:35 AM
Dr Obnxs's Avatar
Dr Obnxs
Dr Obnxs is offline
Former Vendor
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Woodside, CA
Posts: 10,340
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
What?!?!?!?!?!

Originally Posted by bdn
Correct me if I am wrong, as my knowledge of this engine is very limited but here is what I was thinking:

When the chain snaps, the load applied on the shaft by the chain that it was attached to would be immediately released and will be left to spin freely.

Assuming that the friction opposing the spinning shaft is small and as torque applied right before chain breakage accelerated the shaft, the freely spinning shaft would be left to accelerate until it reached the limit set by the rev counter.

The techs are saying that the chain broke because the engine was over-revved something around 6700rpm right before engine shut down. [Data from DME]

Why is it not that the chain broke, resulting in over-revving of whatever shaft that the electronic sensor is monitoring???


My car had excessive noise as describe as 'cold start chatter' as seen on a lot of the videos, and I guess sometimes the chain may break.
6700 RPM and they're dodging the repair? That's total BS. BTW, if the valves won't run correctly, then the motor will slow. Over revving is possible if you downshift at too high a speed.

Matt
 
  #1555  
Old 02-12-2010, 10:21 AM
Crashton's Avatar
Crashton
Crashton is offline
6th Gear
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Over there on MA
Posts: 9,480
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Dr Obnxs
6700 RPM and they're dodging the repair? That's total BS. BTW, if the valves won't run correctly, then the motor will slow. Over revving is possible if you downshift at too high a speed.

Matt
That is the only way I can think of over-revving causing catastrophic failure. Miss shift & downshift from sixth to first at speed, BANG!
 
  #1556  
Old 02-12-2010, 11:27 AM
sequence's Avatar
sequence
sequence is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Your Worst Nightmare :)
Posts: 3,880
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Crashton
That is the only way I can think of over-revving causing catastrophic failure. Miss shift & downshift from sixth to first at speed, BANG!
but wouldnt the rev limiter prevent that from happening??
 
  #1557  
Old 02-12-2010, 11:51 AM
Crashton's Avatar
Crashton
Crashton is offline
6th Gear
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Over there on MA
Posts: 9,480
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
The sixth to first shift is an extreme example. The engine speed would go though the roof & the limiter would do nothing to help the engine live.

Watch those mismatched downshifts.
 
  #1558  
Old 02-12-2010, 01:08 PM
ENGINE 58's Avatar
ENGINE 58
ENGINE 58 is offline
5th Gear
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: florida
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I called today and the sa told me I need a whole new turbo. Said the wastegate was making noise. I might be able to get my car next week.
 
  #1559  
Old 02-12-2010, 04:07 PM
Mabbottusmc's Avatar
Mabbottusmc
Mabbottusmc is offline
2nd Gear
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: San Diego
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I installed my ALTA CAI and Hot side boost tube. Started the car and my wife told me something was rattling. I asked her to wait. I drove the car around the block for a few, came back and she couldn't hear it anymore. The rattle makes teh car sound like junk until it's warm.
 
  #1560  
Old 02-13-2010, 06:03 AM
ENGINE 58's Avatar
ENGINE 58
ENGINE 58 is offline
5th Gear
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: florida
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Has anyone filed lemon law on there cars. If you have can you tell us about what you went through.
 
  #1561  
Old 02-27-2010, 03:04 PM
sequence's Avatar
sequence
sequence is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Your Worst Nightmare :)
Posts: 3,880
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
BUMP

well, the rev-to-3K at shutdown ain't working no more...

3 days ago I go out and start my S, and while it idled fine with no noise, when I put my foot on the gas to about 2K it sounded like a diesel with that knocking sound coming from the passenger side area. no codes, no cel, smooth idle otherwise. lasted a couple minutes then all's well.

then this AM, same thing. got on the phone to my SA and he asked if I'd ever had my tensioner spec'd and chain inspected, I said no, and I described the sound to the tech that Ive known for years, and he's dead-sure it's the tensioner and possibly the chain being too long (?)

I also mentioned I know someone whose car was bulit the same week as mine, and he just had the tensioner work done (and all's well).

so long story short it's going in this friday while Im out of town for a week to get fixed. my dealer tech has dealt with quite a few problems like this, so Im confident all will be well.
 
  #1562  
Old 02-27-2010, 03:52 PM
Rixter's Avatar
Rixter
Rixter is offline
5th Gear
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: North of the 49th
Posts: 828
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Sequence, I'd be really interested to hear your dealer's thoughts on how things will be handled once warranty expires. There've been some (few) reported cases of reoccurances. For others, like me, who've had the (full) fix, maybe we haven't had enough time and milage yet to know if its a permanent fix or not.
 
  #1563  
Old 02-27-2010, 04:18 PM
Gil-galad's Avatar
Gil-galad
Gil-galad is offline
Coordinator :: Eastern Iowa MINIs
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Decorah, IA
Posts: 5,520
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by sequence
well, the rev-to-3K at shutdown ain't working no more...
Glad you didn't put any time and $$ into that patent application...

Seriously though, hope you are back up and rattle free soon.
 
  #1564  
Old 02-28-2010, 07:53 AM
sequence's Avatar
sequence
sequence is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Your Worst Nightmare :)
Posts: 3,880
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
thanks, guys. I knew it would happen soon, just when....

I do know this tho-- if the rattle redevelops and gets fixed right before the 4/50 expires, the work would still be covered under the dealer's 2 year parts and labor warranty that'd extend beyond the 4/50.
 
  #1565  
Old 03-01-2010, 08:59 AM
Rixter's Avatar
Rixter
Rixter is offline
5th Gear
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: North of the 49th
Posts: 828
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Is the SIM-11-02-07 still the same service bulletin being used today? I'm wondering with the new tensioner whether the service bulliten has changed and/or whether any other parts in the service bulletin has changed.

I had the complete fix done based on SIM-11-02-07 but had the older chain tensioner. Now I'm wondering in the long run, if that's going to be a problem?
 
  #1566  
Old 03-01-2010, 11:22 AM
sequence's Avatar
sequence
sequence is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Your Worst Nightmare :)
Posts: 3,880
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
and why do I get the feeling that the impending introduction of an all-Valvetronic turbo Prince engine is in response to all of this "morning sickness" nonsense that's been going what almost 3 years?

I also wonder if, down the road, for all of us who have half-Valvetronic S motors (or "half-breeds") can get a retrofit to the new engine, in case all of these other SIM fixes fail??

And WHY o WHY did PSA-BMW just not make the turbo Prince with all-Valvetronic systems to begin with?? Is anyone thinking over there across the pond??
 
  #1567  
Old 03-01-2010, 04:04 PM
Dr Obnxs's Avatar
Dr Obnxs
Dr Obnxs is offline
Former Vendor
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Woodside, CA
Posts: 10,340
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Cost...

the hardware adds cost. I don't think it would have happened if it weren't for demand for lower fleet mileage ratings, and all these things do up engine efficiency...

While I do think that the fact that BMW/MINI never really figured out the cold start clatter made the decision a bit easier to make to switch, I'm more curious as to why they spent so much time rolling out symptom fix after symptom fix, instead of just doing the HLAs from the start.... It would have cost a bit more up front, but the number of "fixed more than once" would have been near zero...

Matt
 
  #1568  
Old 03-01-2010, 06:45 PM
Rixter's Avatar
Rixter
Rixter is offline
5th Gear
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: North of the 49th
Posts: 828
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I checked work order from June 09 and sure enough the new timing chain tensioner 11-31-7-597-895 was installed. I feel betta. Woohoo
 
  #1569  
Old 03-02-2010, 05:58 AM
sequence's Avatar
sequence
sequence is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Your Worst Nightmare :)
Posts: 3,880
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
thanks for that info Rix. I'll inquire when I drop off Syd on friday.

Perfectly quiet this cold (15 degree) AM...
 
  #1570  
Old 03-03-2010, 11:44 AM
russr's Avatar
russr
russr is offline
5th Gear
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 918
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For those interested, I took mine in on 2/11/10 and had SI 11 02 07 performed on my car. They changed the timing chain and the chain tensioner.

Timing Chain: 11-31-7-534-784
Chain Tensioner: 11-31-7-597-895 and 11-31-7-534-833. I'm not sure why the chain tensioner is listed twice with two different part numbers. Maybe two components of it?
 
  #1571  
Old 03-03-2010, 12:19 PM
Rixter's Avatar
Rixter
Rixter is offline
5th Gear
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: North of the 49th
Posts: 828
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I think if you look at the original 'fix', the '11-31-7-534-833' was the chain tensioner that was required. Now its being automatically substituted by MINI for the 11-31-7-597-895 part, hence the reason the part is quoted twice. Doesn't make sense why they do that but I believe that's the rationale.

http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/05/...d-start-issue/
 

Last edited by Rixter; 03-03-2010 at 01:27 PM.
  #1572  
Old 03-03-2010, 01:06 PM
russr's Avatar
russr
russr is offline
5th Gear
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 918
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rixter
I think if you look at the original 'fix', the '11-31-7-534-833' was the timing chain that was required. Now its being automatically substituted by MINI for the 11-31-7-597-895 part, hence the reason the part is quoted twice. Doesn't make sense why they do that but I believe that's the rationale.

http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/05/...d-start-issue/
Both those parts are components of chain tensioner mechanism, not the timing chain. The 11-31-7-534-833 part has not changed since, it's the other one that is different.
 

Last edited by russr; 03-03-2010 at 01:21 PM.
  #1573  
Old 03-03-2010, 01:28 PM
Rixter's Avatar
Rixter
Rixter is offline
5th Gear
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: North of the 49th
Posts: 828
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by russr
Both those parts are components of chain tensioner mechanism, not the timing chain. The 11-31-7-534-833 part has not changed since, it's the other one that is different.
Oops you're right. Post editied
 
  #1574  
Old 03-03-2010, 01:30 PM
russr's Avatar
russr
russr is offline
5th Gear
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 918
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rixter
Oops you're right. Post editied
BTW, I don't know if you noticed, but the timing chain itself (part # 11-31-7-534-784) has not changed since that post on Motoring file last year. there's a newer post on Motoring file saying they lengthened it, but I haven't seen a new part number for that.
 
  #1575  
Old 03-04-2010, 06:08 AM
sequence's Avatar
sequence
sequence is offline
6th Gear
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Your Worst Nightmare :)
Posts: 3,880
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
man I moved my car from one parking space to another, very short period of time, and when I returned about 2 hours later bambambam super loud rattling diesel sound. took nearly 3 minutes to subside.
 


Quick Reply: Cold start chatter



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:02 PM.