Cold start chatter
#1551
Since the timing chain problem is well known, unless you really were abusing the car, MINI should cover this.
Did you not know about the issue when you drove it for a week with the noise?
#1552
#1553
I thought I was getting the rattle, but it lasted too long and wasn't as harsh. It turned out to be noise made by the vacuum pump. I disconnected the vacuum hose and the noise disappeared, put the hose back on, and the noise is back. After the car warms up, it's still there, but not as bad.
Gotta turn up the stereo and get a louder exhaust
#1554
What?!?!?!?!?!
Correct me if I am wrong, as my knowledge of this engine is very limited but here is what I was thinking:
When the chain snaps, the load applied on the shaft by the chain that it was attached to would be immediately released and will be left to spin freely.
Assuming that the friction opposing the spinning shaft is small and as torque applied right before chain breakage accelerated the shaft, the freely spinning shaft would be left to accelerate until it reached the limit set by the rev counter.
The techs are saying that the chain broke because the engine was over-revved something around 6700rpm right before engine shut down. [Data from DME]
Why is it not that the chain broke, resulting in over-revving of whatever shaft that the electronic sensor is monitoring???
My car had excessive noise as describe as 'cold start chatter' as seen on a lot of the videos, and I guess sometimes the chain may break.
When the chain snaps, the load applied on the shaft by the chain that it was attached to would be immediately released and will be left to spin freely.
Assuming that the friction opposing the spinning shaft is small and as torque applied right before chain breakage accelerated the shaft, the freely spinning shaft would be left to accelerate until it reached the limit set by the rev counter.
The techs are saying that the chain broke because the engine was over-revved something around 6700rpm right before engine shut down. [Data from DME]
Why is it not that the chain broke, resulting in over-revving of whatever shaft that the electronic sensor is monitoring???
My car had excessive noise as describe as 'cold start chatter' as seen on a lot of the videos, and I guess sometimes the chain may break.
Matt
#1555
That is the only way I can think of over-revving causing catastrophic failure. Miss shift & downshift from sixth to first at speed, BANG!
#1557
#1559
#1561
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Your Worst Nightmare :)
Posts: 3,880
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
BUMP
well, the rev-to-3K at shutdown ain't working no more...
3 days ago I go out and start my S, and while it idled fine with no noise, when I put my foot on the gas to about 2K it sounded like a diesel with that knocking sound coming from the passenger side area. no codes, no cel, smooth idle otherwise. lasted a couple minutes then all's well.
then this AM, same thing. got on the phone to my SA and he asked if I'd ever had my tensioner spec'd and chain inspected, I said no, and I described the sound to the tech that Ive known for years, and he's dead-sure it's the tensioner and possibly the chain being too long (?)
I also mentioned I know someone whose car was bulit the same week as mine, and he just had the tensioner work done (and all's well).
so long story short it's going in this friday while Im out of town for a week to get fixed. my dealer tech has dealt with quite a few problems like this, so Im confident all will be well.
3 days ago I go out and start my S, and while it idled fine with no noise, when I put my foot on the gas to about 2K it sounded like a diesel with that knocking sound coming from the passenger side area. no codes, no cel, smooth idle otherwise. lasted a couple minutes then all's well.
then this AM, same thing. got on the phone to my SA and he asked if I'd ever had my tensioner spec'd and chain inspected, I said no, and I described the sound to the tech that Ive known for years, and he's dead-sure it's the tensioner and possibly the chain being too long (?)
I also mentioned I know someone whose car was bulit the same week as mine, and he just had the tensioner work done (and all's well).
so long story short it's going in this friday while Im out of town for a week to get fixed. my dealer tech has dealt with quite a few problems like this, so Im confident all will be well.
#1562
Sequence, I'd be really interested to hear your dealer's thoughts on how things will be handled once warranty expires. There've been some (few) reported cases of reoccurances. For others, like me, who've had the (full) fix, maybe we haven't had enough time and milage yet to know if its a permanent fix or not.
#1563
#1565
Is the SIM-11-02-07 still the same service bulletin being used today? I'm wondering with the new tensioner whether the service bulliten has changed and/or whether any other parts in the service bulletin has changed.
I had the complete fix done based on SIM-11-02-07 but had the older chain tensioner. Now I'm wondering in the long run, if that's going to be a problem?
I had the complete fix done based on SIM-11-02-07 but had the older chain tensioner. Now I'm wondering in the long run, if that's going to be a problem?
#1566
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Your Worst Nightmare :)
Posts: 3,880
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
and why do I get the feeling that the impending introduction of an all-Valvetronic turbo Prince engine is in response to all of this "morning sickness" nonsense that's been going what almost 3 years?
I also wonder if, down the road, for all of us who have half-Valvetronic S motors (or "half-breeds") can get a retrofit to the new engine, in case all of these other SIM fixes fail??
And WHY o WHY did PSA-BMW just not make the turbo Prince with all-Valvetronic systems to begin with?? Is anyone thinking over there across the pond??
I also wonder if, down the road, for all of us who have half-Valvetronic S motors (or "half-breeds") can get a retrofit to the new engine, in case all of these other SIM fixes fail??
And WHY o WHY did PSA-BMW just not make the turbo Prince with all-Valvetronic systems to begin with?? Is anyone thinking over there across the pond??
#1567
Cost...
the hardware adds cost. I don't think it would have happened if it weren't for demand for lower fleet mileage ratings, and all these things do up engine efficiency...
While I do think that the fact that BMW/MINI never really figured out the cold start clatter made the decision a bit easier to make to switch, I'm more curious as to why they spent so much time rolling out symptom fix after symptom fix, instead of just doing the HLAs from the start.... It would have cost a bit more up front, but the number of "fixed more than once" would have been near zero...
Matt
While I do think that the fact that BMW/MINI never really figured out the cold start clatter made the decision a bit easier to make to switch, I'm more curious as to why they spent so much time rolling out symptom fix after symptom fix, instead of just doing the HLAs from the start.... It would have cost a bit more up front, but the number of "fixed more than once" would have been near zero...
Matt
#1570
For those interested, I took mine in on 2/11/10 and had SI 11 02 07 performed on my car. They changed the timing chain and the chain tensioner.
Timing Chain: 11-31-7-534-784
Chain Tensioner: 11-31-7-597-895 and 11-31-7-534-833. I'm not sure why the chain tensioner is listed twice with two different part numbers. Maybe two components of it?
Timing Chain: 11-31-7-534-784
Chain Tensioner: 11-31-7-597-895 and 11-31-7-534-833. I'm not sure why the chain tensioner is listed twice with two different part numbers. Maybe two components of it?
#1571
I think if you look at the original 'fix', the '11-31-7-534-833' was the chain tensioner that was required. Now its being automatically substituted by MINI for the 11-31-7-597-895 part, hence the reason the part is quoted twice. Doesn't make sense why they do that but I believe that's the rationale.
http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/05/...d-start-issue/
http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/05/...d-start-issue/
Last edited by Rixter; 03-03-2010 at 01:27 PM.
#1572
I think if you look at the original 'fix', the '11-31-7-534-833' was the timing chain that was required. Now its being automatically substituted by MINI for the 11-31-7-597-895 part, hence the reason the part is quoted twice. Doesn't make sense why they do that but I believe that's the rationale.
http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/05/...d-start-issue/
http://www.motoringfile.com/2009/05/...d-start-issue/
Last edited by russr; 03-03-2010 at 01:21 PM.
#1573
#1574
BTW, I don't know if you noticed, but the timing chain itself (part # 11-31-7-534-784) has not changed since that post on Motoring file last year. there's a newer post on Motoring file saying they lengthened it, but I haven't seen a new part number for that.