Stock Problems/Issues Discussions related to warranty related issues and repairs, or other problems with the OEM parts and software for MINI Cooper (R50), Cabrio (R52), and Cooper S (R53) MINIs.

Larger Throttle body 62mm

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #51  
Old 10-11-2005 | 06:04 PM
J0kER's Avatar
J0kER
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
From: EastSide .: =0)
do0D, sounds like u got ur ride tricked out NiCE!!



(no facts, jus conjecture) huh, im gonna go w/this is a fact... ('dinan' vs. anythin' else) J/K
Originally Posted by L8RG8R
I do not see what year your MCS is, but if it is pre-05 then go with the larger bore and forget about Dinan. The worst that can happen is you'll get a little more pronounced yo-yo, but the smile on your face will more than compensate for that. Just do it!!!

Bear in mind that Dinan is a BMW tuner first and a MINI tuner second. Their big bore throttle body is probably on the market because BMW gets a cut of their profits (no facts, just conjecture) and they needed to have one considering BMW is stamped all over the engine bay of the MINI. This part is one of those tricky ones that does not add a tremendous amount of anything, so if this is your first mod then spend your money somewhere else. If this is one of your last engine bay mods then go for it!



 
  #52  
Old 10-11-2005 | 08:27 PM
Minirox's Avatar
Minirox
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
From: Washington State
Originally Posted by mellow
So can someone tell me if the additional HP/throttle response is that impressive between a Dinan and say a 62mm TB.

If there is a hugh difference then I would say going through the aggrevations seen with the larger TB is worth it. If there isn't why wouldn't a Dinan be sufficient?

And as I stated earlier, Dinan website states "This product is no longer sold on an exchange basis, therefore no core charge applies".

Can someone enlighten me.
In my case the Dinan is working better in all around preformance than the larger throttle body. (Butt dyno and track times) and to answer the question no you can't tell the difference between 60mm and 62mm.(but the car can) The aggrevation was not worth it to me.
 
  #53  
Old 10-11-2005 | 09:20 PM
J0kER's Avatar
J0kER
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
From: EastSide .: =0)
.....that bad huh!?!?!
Originally Posted by Minirox
In my case the Dinan is working better in all around preformance than the larger throttle body. (Butt dyno and track times) and to answer the question no you can't tell the difference between 60mm and 62mm.(but the car can) The aggrevation was not worth it to me.
 
  #54  
Old 10-11-2005 | 09:35 PM
caminifan's Avatar
caminifan
6th Gear
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by Dr Obnxs
The progamming for drive by wire only appears to screw up throttle tip-in, not WOT. WOT is wide open, and the additional capacity will help at the high end, and maybe a bit before, as the pressure in front of the SC will be a bit higher, and more stuff into the SC, is more boost, is more power....
Maybe the solution is to only run the larger TB when at the track? On the street, WOT doesn't seem practical.

Originally Posted by Dr Obnxs
I don't think any Dinan TBs will complain, as there's is less than 60 mm diameter. Seems that the ECU programming can deal with that little a change...
Hmmm. Maybe a Dinan TB may be the solution for the street with light tracking?
 
  #55  
Old 10-12-2005 | 04:04 AM
L8RG8R's Avatar
L8RG8R
2nd Gear
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore, MD
Or, go with the non-Dinan TB and install Andy's VGS to smooth out the low end. I hear that works very well for most owners of 60+mm TBs.
 
  #56  
Old 10-12-2005 | 04:35 AM
mellow's Avatar
mellow
2nd Gear
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina
Originally Posted by L8RG8R
Or, go with the non-Dinan TB and install Andy's VGS to smooth out the low end. I hear that works very well for most owners of 60+mm TBs.
I'd like to hear from those who have the larger TB (60-62) and have put on Andy's VGS. Has this eliminated the problems being encountered?

I'm ready to take the TB plunge and already have Andy's VGS mod installed. At the moment I'm leaning towards Dinan since it seems as if Dinan owners are happy with the TB. If the larger TB + VGS = no throttle concerns I might go with either the M7 or WebbMotors.

Thanks!
 
  #57  
Old 10-12-2005 | 07:12 PM
Dr Obnxs's Avatar
Dr Obnxs
Former Vendor
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,340
Likes: 4
From: Woodside, CA
I have the VGS and that doesn't solve the issues.

Due to stupidity on my part (didn't charge the laptop) I haven't logged the 60mm yet. But the M7 62/3 was too challenging for the ECU. I'm pretty sure the drive by wire programming is the problem. It also has some drift compensation algorithms in it (try pressing the gas pedal very, very slowly at constant speed on the freeway, and feel what happens to the acceleration, or lack thereof!) as well as predictive algorithms (if you start to hammer the throttle, it opens the TB A LOT, since the computer is pretty sure that you want to go real fast real quick. But when putting around town, the model of airflow vs throttle angle is all out of whack, and if you do the math it's worse at small openings. The only real way to fix this is to change the programming in the ECU. But there are over 40 ECU software revs (I read that v43 is out?), and some of them are better at handleing the larger TBs than others. Based on what I've read, if you have an 05, or have upgraded to v39 or 40 for the emissions recall (manditory in CA), you may be screwed. Someone in another thread said v43 helped a lot of drivability issues, but I don't know if anyone with v43 has added a large TB.

Back to the smaller M7 and Dinan. I've driven the 60mm for a few days (despite my stupidity at not data logging) and have found it to be a pleasure to drive. The issues aren't 100% gone, but they seem less intrusive than the RyePhix II was, at least to my taste. The car still goes real lean at small throttle opening, but I didn't ever check if that happened with the stock TB (didn't have it when I put the wide band in). EGTs are down a bit with the 60mm, I'm not hitting over 1000C anymore on my commute into work. But going back to the one ball helped here as well. I think any issues will be more sever with free flow exhausts (and I mean free flow! I have the OBX header, and had a larger CAT, 2.5" pipes, and a resonator and muffler that did their fucntions in name only, would have failed sound at Laguna Seca, and gave the wife and me a headache!) where the issues were terrible with the 62mm unit. Going to the one-ball made it better, and the 60mm was better still. I'll stick with the 60mm. If the 62mm were my only choice, I would have gone back to stock.

But I'm getting good at changing them. My record is about 15min with the stock intake. With the HAI it will take less than 5!

Also, I may put the 63 back on and wiretie the bypass valve, just to see what it's like. should be the best performance out there, but loose some gas milage....

Matt
 
  #58  
Old 10-12-2005 | 07:31 PM
Minirox's Avatar
Minirox
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
From: Washington State
Originally Posted by mellow
I'd like to hear from those who have the larger TB (60-62) and have put on Andy's VGS. Has this eliminated the problems being encountered?

I'm ready to take the TB plunge and already have Andy's VGS mod installed. At the moment I'm leaning towards Dinan since it seems as if Dinan owners are happy with the TB. If the larger TB + VGS = no throttle concerns I might go with either the M7 or WebbMotors.

Thanks!
I had the vgs mod when I went to the larger TB then went back to stock no difference I tried the bypass valve adjustments no difference flat spot still present. Also tried MTH no difference.
 
  #59  
Old 10-13-2005 | 07:33 AM
J0kER's Avatar
J0kER
6th Gear
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
From: EastSide .: =0)
hmmm!! no difference huh...that sux!
 
  #60  
Old 10-13-2005 | 10:43 AM
caminifan's Avatar
caminifan
6th Gear
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 3
Barring some new development, it would seem that larger TBs are a racing-only mod. There might be a partial opportunity for benefit on the street from the Dinan TB, but that doesn't seem to be strongly confirmed at this point.
 
  #61  
Old 10-13-2005 | 11:19 AM
Dr Obnxs's Avatar
Dr Obnxs
Former Vendor
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,340
Likes: 4
From: Woodside, CA
Not sure if this is true.

Originally Posted by caminifan
Barring some new development, it would seem that larger TBs are a racing-only mod. There might be a partial opportunity for benefit on the street from the Dinan TB, but that doesn't seem to be strongly confirmed at this point.
Success with larger TBs seems tied to what ECU software or ECU mods are on your car. Some run the street just fine, and others have problems. There is no absolute position that is accurate for all Mini owners.

I would think it's fair to say that this mod should be approached with caution, and an informed decision is much better than buy and bolt and hope for the best.

I haven't heard if the GIAC, UniChip, EvoTech or others can program out the problems, or if this is just a fact of life with certain ECU software revisions. I also haven't tested if this all goes away with the BP Valve wiretied shut (some think this happens when the bypass valve is only part way open).

Too early to call.....

Matt
 
  #62  
Old 10-13-2005 | 11:30 AM
minimc's Avatar
minimc
5th Gear
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by Minirox
I am still wondering if there are more out there besides Misfit that had throttle bodys prior to V38 with no flat spot issues.
You can count me in with MSFITOY. I had a WMS T/B on my 03 with original software - no updates. Car was SUPER strong, no stumble & awsome throttle response. Then dealer did the emissions update... got V41.1 installed. Car drives like shiznit! Worst part is I told them NOT to touch my ECU!!! Told them it was my car & I didn't care what they said about warranty. NICE

There ouhgt to be a way to COMPELL mini to reinstall my original software... none of this "can't go backwards" B.S.
 
  #63  
Old 10-13-2005 | 11:58 AM
caminifan's Avatar
caminifan
6th Gear
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 3
I think this is the most accurate statement on the issue so far:

Originally Posted by Dr Obnxs
...I would think it's fair to say that this mod should be approached with caution, and an informed decision is much better than buy and bolt and hope for the best.
The problem is that if you look at the web sites of the various vendors that sell the larger TB, you would think that the larger TB is a plug-and-play solution along the path for more hp and ft/lbs. Also, there are more things that are unknown than known about the interplay between a larger TB and the DME code set (which would include the Drive-by-Wire function as well). You touched on many of them in your earlier posts; there may be more that is not known as well.

Personally, I think I will continue to monitor the situation and for the moment, a larger TB has moved to the bottom of my modification priority list.
 
  #64  
Old 10-13-2005 | 12:55 PM
red rage's Avatar
red rage
4th Gear
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
QUESTION:

DOESN'T IT MAKE SENSE TO UPGRADE THE INJECTORS WHEN YOU UPGRADE TO A LARGER T.B. ?

MORE AIR and MORE FUEL


Originally Posted by caminifan
I think this is the most accurate statement on the issue so far:

The problem is that if you look at the web sites of the various vendors that sell the larger TB, you would think that the larger TB is a plug-and-play solution along the path for more hp and ft/lbs. Also, there are more things that are unknown than known about the interplay between a larger TB and the DME code set (which would include the Drive-by-Wire function as well). You touched on many of them in your earlier posts; there may be more that is not known as well.

Personally, I think I will continue to monitor the situation and for the moment, a larger TB has moved to the bottom of my modification priority list.
 
  #65  
Old 10-13-2005 | 01:31 PM
minimc's Avatar
minimc
5th Gear
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by caminifan
I think this is the most accurate statement on the issue so far:

The problem is that if you look at the web sites of the various vendors that sell the larger TB, you would think that the larger TB is a plug-and-play solution along the path for more hp and ft/lbs. Also, there are more things that are unknown than known about the interplay between a larger TB and the DME code set (which would include the Drive-by-Wire function as well). You touched on many of them in your earlier posts; there may be more that is not known as well.

Personally, I think I will continue to monitor the situation and for the moment, a larger TB has moved to the bottom of my modification priority list.
In my case the T/B was plug and play. It worked phenomenally for 1.5 years... Until MINI decided to treat me to some new software.

Problems only began to occur with newer cars/software? Irrespective of T/B. I can't recall hearing about 'the stumble' or 'yo-yo' until well into 2003 - after MINI came up with new versions of software.

IMO this is not a throttle body issue - its software. Though I can totally appreciate why anyone would avoid an aftermarket T/B at the mo'.

Originally Posted by red rage
QUESTION:

DOESN'T IT MAKE SENSE TO UPGRADE THE INJECTORS WHEN YOU UPGRADE TO A LARGER T.B. ?

MORE AIR and MORE FUEL
From looking at my A/F ratios I'd say no... Injectors seem to be fine until open-loop fueling occurs. Part throttle shouldn't be an issue.
 
  #66  
Old 10-13-2005 | 10:14 PM
caminifan's Avatar
caminifan
6th Gear
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by red rage
QUESTION:

DOESN'T IT MAKE SENSE TO UPGRADE THE INJECTORS WHEN YOU UPGRADE TO A LARGER T.B. ?

MORE AIR and MORE FUEL
A larger TB in and of itself does not require a move to larger injectors. What is happening along with the larger TB is more important. If a better flowing head has been added along with a TB and free-flow exhaust (header and cat-back), then you could be looking at the need to go with a set of larger injectors.
 
  #67  
Old 10-19-2005 | 06:21 AM
Minzilla's Avatar
Minzilla
4th Gear
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
From: Galion, OH
Randy/ Peter, is anyone looking at a remap of the Unichip to add more fuel at the lean conditions?

Thanks
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bahman
MINIs & Minis for Sale
13
02-14-2016 10:29 AM
wildwestrider
R50/R53 :: Hatch Talk (2002-2006)
11
01-29-2016 05:06 PM
Qik420
R56 :: Hatch Talk (2007+)
1
10-04-2015 08:19 PM
Qik420
1st Gear
5
10-01-2015 12:02 PM
Emnotek
Vendor Announcements
0
09-29-2015 07:37 AM



Quick Reply: Larger Throttle body 62mm



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:33 AM.