Suspension TSW R56 springs - coming soon
#76
I do have my fingers crossed, but with increased trepidation, since the drop you indicate is the opposite of what TSW was talking about 2 months ago -- see posts of 3-19- and 3-20-08. At that time TSW seemed to want to decrease the rake, at least slightly, by offering a greater drop in back. I liked their reasoning. The drop indicated here would seem to have the opposite effect. Has testing made that much difference in the fundamental concept? Please understand, I'm not questioning your information. To the contrary, I'm grateful for it, since it's the only specific info we've gotten in a long while, and we're not hearing from TSW directly. I like the amount, or degree, of the drop; I'm just increasingly curious as to how it got to be what it is (apparently).
#77
Is there anything definative regarding the drop these springs will provide, or when they will be available?
At the moment I have Mach V springs installed; and while I actually appreciate the very firm ride, I do not like the lowering they provided. From the stock ride height my car was lowered about 1.25" in the rear (as expected) and 1.5" in the front (more than expected). This increased the rake of the car and I don't really like the look. Plus the front spoiler is so low that it scrapes frequently.
I am hoping the TSW springs in final form provide approximately 1" lowering in the rear and a bit less in the front, thus reversing (but not eliminating) some of the rake that the car has. An update on the status and the specs. would really be appreciated.
At the moment I have Mach V springs installed; and while I actually appreciate the very firm ride, I do not like the lowering they provided. From the stock ride height my car was lowered about 1.25" in the rear (as expected) and 1.5" in the front (more than expected). This increased the rake of the car and I don't really like the look. Plus the front spoiler is so low that it scrapes frequently.
I am hoping the TSW springs in final form provide approximately 1" lowering in the rear and a bit less in the front, thus reversing (but not eliminating) some of the rake that the car has. An update on the status and the specs. would really be appreciated.
Last edited by E-Ticket; 06-28-2008 at 09:56 AM. Reason: revise confusing text
#80
Yes, it was... It's taken us awhile.
Why? The rates, free length of the fronts, and shapes are VERY different than the earlier platform... So much so that we had them tested by two different places to make sure we were on the right trail. We also tested the OEM struts/shocks on a dyno... We also observed a few R56's at the autocross and on the track - at the Autocross, we noted SIGNIFICANTLY more squat at launch than on the earlier platforms! We felt that we needed more data to get them right...
The final prototypes will be on their way to us shortly - cold wound, maintains the same rate bias as the OEM springs with a bump front and rear, 1" drop in the front and 3/4" drop in the rear. We'll rinse them out thoroughly before we release them, so be patient - we won't release them until we're sure we nailed it, and springs are somewhat of a black art!
Why? The rates, free length of the fronts, and shapes are VERY different than the earlier platform... So much so that we had them tested by two different places to make sure we were on the right trail. We also tested the OEM struts/shocks on a dyno... We also observed a few R56's at the autocross and on the track - at the Autocross, we noted SIGNIFICANTLY more squat at launch than on the earlier platforms! We felt that we needed more data to get them right...
The final prototypes will be on their way to us shortly - cold wound, maintains the same rate bias as the OEM springs with a bump front and rear, 1" drop in the front and 3/4" drop in the rear. We'll rinse them out thoroughly before we release them, so be patient - we won't release them until we're sure we nailed it, and springs are somewhat of a black art!
#81
Appreciate hearing from you guys! It's encouraging for us "true believers," especially hearing some of the design considerations. Some of us have asked around about Koni Yellows, which seem to be the "shock of choice" with TSW springs. It appears that Yellows for the R56 will be out in the next few months. So, on the whole, it seems that things are coming together just about right, and we'll wait on patiently. By all means, keep up the good work!
#82
Yes, it was... It's taken us awhile.
Why? The rates, free length of the fronts, and shapes are VERY different than the earlier platform... So much so that we had them tested by two different places to make sure we were on the right trail. We also tested the OEM struts/shocks on a dyno... We also observed a few R56's at the autocross and on the track - at the Autocross, we noted SIGNIFICANTLY more squat at launch than on the earlier platforms! We felt that we needed more data to get them right...
The final prototypes will be on their way to us shortly - cold wound, maintains the same rate bias as the OEM springs with a bump front and rear, 1" drop in the front and 3/4" drop in the rear. We'll rinse them out thoroughly before we release them, so be patient - we won't release them until we're sure we nailed it, and springs are somewhat of a black art!
Why? The rates, free length of the fronts, and shapes are VERY different than the earlier platform... So much so that we had them tested by two different places to make sure we were on the right trail. We also tested the OEM struts/shocks on a dyno... We also observed a few R56's at the autocross and on the track - at the Autocross, we noted SIGNIFICANTLY more squat at launch than on the earlier platforms! We felt that we needed more data to get them right...
The final prototypes will be on their way to us shortly - cold wound, maintains the same rate bias as the OEM springs with a bump front and rear, 1" drop in the front and 3/4" drop in the rear. We'll rinse them out thoroughly before we release them, so be patient - we won't release them until we're sure we nailed it, and springs are somewhat of a black art!
#83
#84
no kiddin more rake isn't going to be so popular.. BUT... having tossed my car around and experienced the traction problems and lots of lift from all the torque, and not ever had my back end come out on me, these TSW springs sound like the right formula for drop AND performance gain.
#85
Linear spring rates are absolutely the better way to go on the R56 so huge thumbs up on that
#88
#89
#90
Bought a set of JCW's from the dealer for 300 bucks.
Mark
#94
I agree that they'll be quality springs but it's been 5 months since their post announcing that they'll be working on the springs. I understand it takes time to do development but the 2009 R56's are going to be out shortly (if not already) thus making the R56 3 years old.
I just didn't want to wait any longer. I'm sure those more patient will be rewarded for their wait.
Mark
#95
#96
Works perfect.
Mark
#97
Yes, I know people are getting tired of waiting... I get 2-3 emails and/or PM's a week asing about them. As with our R50/R53 springs, we've got to get it right the first time, which takes time...
We have the prototypes coming now and will be installing them shortly for final testing - it'll take at least a few weeks before know we did it right.
So, apologies for the delay, but as with our other springs and suspension components, these will also be the Mutt's Nuts!
We have the prototypes coming now and will be installing them shortly for final testing - it'll take at least a few weeks before know we did it right.
So, apologies for the delay, but as with our other springs and suspension components, these will also be the Mutt's Nuts!
#98
3rd gen prototype springs arrived today after a delay (thanks Ike and other bigger fish), with a gorgeous powdercoat job I might add...
Static measurement is 1" shorter in front and 3/4" shorter in rear, which should prove excellent in combating any unwanted squat under acceleration. We went up 1 more wire diameter in the front for this pass. Same cold wound, chromium silicon wire as always with a linear rate. I'll post rates and whatnot after we have confirmed testing went well.
These will be installed Saturday on an R56 Cooper with the sport package - we figure this will give us a good platform, since it's among the "lighter" R56 models. And yes, we'll take tons of pics!The test mule will be autocrossing and doing a track weekend before we call it good. If we did our homework right on this set, we'll have production springs in stock before the end of October!
Static measurement is 1" shorter in front and 3/4" shorter in rear, which should prove excellent in combating any unwanted squat under acceleration. We went up 1 more wire diameter in the front for this pass. Same cold wound, chromium silicon wire as always with a linear rate. I'll post rates and whatnot after we have confirmed testing went well.
These will be installed Saturday on an R56 Cooper with the sport package - we figure this will give us a good platform, since it's among the "lighter" R56 models. And yes, we'll take tons of pics!The test mule will be autocrossing and doing a track weekend before we call it good. If we did our homework right on this set, we'll have production springs in stock before the end of October!