Suspension Thinking BC
#3
there's a sticky in this category that has info.
here's the link just in case
https://www.northamericanmotoring.co...-feedback.html
here's the link just in case
https://www.northamericanmotoring.co...-feedback.html
#4
I'm very interested in these coilovers as well. What that thread doesn't specifically address is how much they actually drop the car. I also haven't read that entire thread so maybe it's in there somewhere. I want to run a 205/45/16 tire, but from looking a Ryephile's photos on 205/40/16, I'm afraid these won't give me the drop I'm looking for. Would I be able to have slight tuck in the rear with these coilovers combined with swift springs? I know the Cross will give me the drop I want, but with my car being strictly street driven, I'm not willing to spend that kind of money. Any opinions?
#7
Trending Topics
#8
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
From: Minneapolis Minnesota
Thanks
#9
#10
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
From: Minneapolis Minnesota
Instead of rummaging around for the answer in old threads, maybe this is faster.
I have read that there is two generations if you will of the BCs. The second one has the pillow ball mounts on the rear and the first gen ones don't, right? Does anyone know when the second gen ones came out or anyway to tell the two of them apart?
I have read that there is two generations if you will of the BCs. The second one has the pillow ball mounts on the rear and the first gen ones don't, right? Does anyone know when the second gen ones came out or anyway to tell the two of them apart?
#11
#13
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
From: Minneapolis Minnesota
I've looked at Cross, and I know they're great, if not the best, but thats nearly $1700 more than I can get the BCs for right now. I found some for sale and never installed for $700. Thats why I am asking all the questions, so I know what to expect if I get them. There is just know way I can shell out 2.4K for the Cross.
Thanks for the suggestion though.
Thanks for the suggestion though.
#16
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
From: Minneapolis Minnesota
Ahhh... Found some other good ones at WMW. http://www.waymotorworks.com/product...cat=305&page=2
I assume that because WMW has them, they are probably pretty good. Anyone else have the Megan Racing coilovers? $850 is right in my price range too. For those of you who think the BC's aren't the best idea, what do you think of these???
I assume that because WMW has them, they are probably pretty good. Anyone else have the Megan Racing coilovers? $850 is right in my price range too. For those of you who think the BC's aren't the best idea, what do you think of these???
#17
I still run my BC's, with Swift springs on my track-focused R53. The springs that come with the BC's are utter crap, so plan right now to buy good springs, be they Hyperco, Swift, KW, Eibach racing and the like. The BC's construction is very good, however their dampers are straight rates, not digressive, so the damping is the same whether you're turning into a corner or hitting a sharp bump. For most people, they'll feel more harsh. They also have less overall stroke than stock @ 3.5" including bumpstop compression, so those that go off-roading can cross these off their list. The mounting plates on the BC's are probably some of the best around however; the pillow ***** are very nice and the rear mounts are something most coilovers don't bother with. If BC offered independant compression and rebound adjustment on a nicely digressive damper and ditched the springs they'd have a grand slam, not just a pretty nice product, IMO.
#18
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
From: Minneapolis Minnesota
#19
BC and Megans are the exact same thing. BC makes coilovers for Megan. So either way the springs will be the same.
I really do like the tophats on the BC as well. But the main reason why some of the other suspension companies to not make the rear brackets is because it is very hard to machine the rear tophats at the slant that the stock tophats are made. People have produced the flat ones made like the BC but with aggressive driving the rear shaft has the potential to snap because there is too much pressure being put onto it. Other manufacturers did not want to risk this kind of problem. BC and Megan apparently will. Anyways there is a company called endless that makes big brake kits, and they made the rear tophats for mini coilovers for race use only. Because they encountered this problem they decided to discontinue the whole project and had everyone return the item to endless.
I really do like the tophats on the BC as well. But the main reason why some of the other suspension companies to not make the rear brackets is because it is very hard to machine the rear tophats at the slant that the stock tophats are made. People have produced the flat ones made like the BC but with aggressive driving the rear shaft has the potential to snap because there is too much pressure being put onto it. Other manufacturers did not want to risk this kind of problem. BC and Megan apparently will. Anyways there is a company called endless that makes big brake kits, and they made the rear tophats for mini coilovers for race use only. Because they encountered this problem they decided to discontinue the whole project and had everyone return the item to endless.
#20
#21
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
From: Minneapolis Minnesota
#24
The Cross are zinc coated, so they have good corrosion resistance. The BC's are powder coated, which is also very durable.
FWIW, the BC rear top hats have enough angular clearance that they do not bind through the suspension stroke. I don't see how the design would be a problem. Endless must've not done their homework for their top hats to clear at full compression [where the angle is greatest]
FWIW, the BC rear top hats have enough angular clearance that they do not bind through the suspension stroke. I don't see how the design would be a problem. Endless must've not done their homework for their top hats to clear at full compression [where the angle is greatest]