Better ride? 205/45/17 RF vs. 215/40/17 non rf
#1
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Socal
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Better ride? 205/45/17 RF vs. 215/40/17 non rf
I tried seraching for this topic w/ limited results.
So...Im bought myself some hamann hm4 17x8 rims and Im leaning towards the 215/40/17 even though I know the 215/45/17 will give me a better ride Im nervous about potential rubbing issues. I currently have the 205/45 factory run flats and I was wondering if the 215/40/17's are just as harsh or worse. Your input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks
Ps: Ill be getting the Kumho Ecsta SPT if that helps.
So...Im bought myself some hamann hm4 17x8 rims and Im leaning towards the 215/40/17 even though I know the 215/45/17 will give me a better ride Im nervous about potential rubbing issues. I currently have the 205/45 factory run flats and I was wondering if the 215/40/17's are just as harsh or worse. Your input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks
Ps: Ill be getting the Kumho Ecsta SPT if that helps.
#2
I tried seraching for this topic w/ limited results.
So...Im bought myself some hamann hm4 17x8 rims and Im leaning towards the 215/40/17 even though I know the 215/45/17 will give me a better ride Im nervous about potential rubbing issues. I currently have the 205/45 factory run flats and I was wondering if the 215/40/17's are just as harsh or worse. Your input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks
Ps: Ill be getting the Kumho Ecsta SPT if that helps.
So...Im bought myself some hamann hm4 17x8 rims and Im leaning towards the 215/40/17 even though I know the 215/45/17 will give me a better ride Im nervous about potential rubbing issues. I currently have the 205/45 factory run flats and I was wondering if the 215/40/17's are just as harsh or worse. Your input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks
Ps: Ill be getting the Kumho Ecsta SPT if that helps.
OEM runflats are pretty stiff.
Kumho Ecsta SPT is an Ultra High Performance Summer tire.
Tests are good
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tests/...lay.jsp?ttid=4
215/40-17 is also pretty stiff. Ecsta SPT not overly so.
I would think that if you had OEM suspension and stock alignment settings you could be OK on smooth roads.
If you have really bad roads then even 215/45-17 will be rough.
If you lower your MINI but keep alignment to stock settings you should be OK.
#4
However using Koni FSD shocks might offer very decent comfort as well as improved performance for street use.
Given your choice of suspension the 215/40-17 non runflats should be OK for street use. If not then add the Koni FSD shocks at some point.
#5
I had the stock RFs...then went to a lighter rim and 215/40/17 Yoko ES 100s. Im now on my second set of these tires in the same dimensions...I'm on stock suspension w/ an '02 MCS...the ride is definately harsher, but I enjoy it...I feel more in tune w/ the road...(my kidneys are more in tune as well )...Keep in mind w/ the 215/40/17 your speedo will read a bit faster and it has been mentioned in a previous thread that your warranty based on miles will expire a bit sooner. The smaller circumference will also change your gearing a bit as well.....I dont have any rubbing issues and that is w/ a +42 offset Montegi Trak Lite rim.
Last edited by TwOMINIs; 05-07-2007 at 11:16 PM. Reason: typo
#6
#7
1. getting rid of RFs is a huge improvement in ride quality, period.
2. i just switched to Goodyear F1 GSD 215.45.17 and am very pleased. the ride is much "kinder" than the stock RFs and the tires stay "planted" better on the road as opposed to the RFs. i attribute much of this to the reduced sidewall stiffness.
3. i wanted the 40s for the look of the lower profile but i realized that since i am running a stock/non-lowered suspension that the gap at the wheelwell would be greater and less attractive, so i opted for the 45s.
2. i just switched to Goodyear F1 GSD 215.45.17 and am very pleased. the ride is much "kinder" than the stock RFs and the tires stay "planted" better on the road as opposed to the RFs. i attribute much of this to the reduced sidewall stiffness.
3. i wanted the 40s for the look of the lower profile but i realized that since i am running a stock/non-lowered suspension that the gap at the wheelwell would be greater and less attractive, so i opted for the 45s.
Trending Topics
#8
215/45-17 would be smoother riding than 215/40-17 but also slightly taller than stock sized but it will still fit OK using stock suspension and have no rubbing.
This assumes the same tire but different sizes is being considered. Some tires are stiffer than others. Comfort depends on design and materials of the tire itself.
#9
Yes, with stock suspension there should be no rubbing with either of these tire sizes since they are stock sized or smaller.
215/45-17 would be smoother riding than 215/40-17 but also slightly taller than stock sized but it will still fit OK using stock suspension and have no rubbing.
This assumes the same tire but different sizes is being considered. Some tires are stiffer than others. Comfort depends on design and materials of the tire itself.
215/45-17 would be smoother riding than 215/40-17 but also slightly taller than stock sized but it will still fit OK using stock suspension and have no rubbing.
This assumes the same tire but different sizes is being considered. Some tires are stiffer than others. Comfort depends on design and materials of the tire itself.
I did do some driving school events and track lapping and autocross in them. As they aged they got noisey and rough riding. They did tramline on the freeway in the grooves.
When I switched to Bridgestone Potenza S-03 in the same size it was like night and day better. It was better handling dry or wet AND smoother ride, more comfort and less noise. It was also double the price. Since then I have been using the S-03 and likely will change them for Eagle F1 GS-D3 soon.
#11
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Emnotek
Vendor Announcements
0
09-29-2015 07:37 AM