205-45-17 versus 215-45-17
#1
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: the great country of california
Posts: 2,068
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
205-45-17 versus 215-45-17
I put my runflats on two days ago because it was going into the shop and got it back today. I notice that the turn in seems quicker. Is this a result of the smaller footprint of the 205? Plus, my car seems to roll easier as well even though my S-lites weigh more then my SSR GT1.
I think my driving might consist of one or two autocrosses a year and maybe a driving school session or two.
When my Kumhos wear out should I consider going back to the 205 size?
I think my driving might consist of one or two autocrosses a year and maybe a driving school session or two.
When my Kumhos wear out should I consider going back to the 205 size?
#2
#3
You've experienced what I've noticed as well. I refer to this feeling as "nimbleness".
I'd liken the difference in feeling to wearing different shoes; cross-trainers give you better overall grip (bigger contact patch), but wrestling shoes (with their tight fit) feel more nimble. I have no doubt that the larger contact patch tire has a higher level of absolute grip (assuming they're getting to the proper temp), but a smaller tire will have more steering feel. Steering feel is not be confused with a lower/stiffer sidewall.
Do you guys agree with this description/conclusion?
I'd liken the difference in feeling to wearing different shoes; cross-trainers give you better overall grip (bigger contact patch), but wrestling shoes (with their tight fit) feel more nimble. I have no doubt that the larger contact patch tire has a higher level of absolute grip (assuming they're getting to the proper temp), but a smaller tire will have more steering feel. Steering feel is not be confused with a lower/stiffer sidewall.
Do you guys agree with this description/conclusion?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Miata13
Tires, Wheels, & Brakes
5
09-12-2015 04:18 AM
PSIChocolate
Stock Problems/Issues
1
08-13-2015 12:46 PM