When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Handling is key. I drove a JCW car that had the JCW suspension, the 18" JCW wheels and runflats. It was a bit too rough for me but i suspect thats because of the combination of all three.
I suppose the question is, what are the performance pros and cons of the sizes? I do not plan to use runflats.
Anyone have a pic of a car with JCW brakes that runs similar 18's?
for exceptional handling, and acceleration...paired with price and the ability to run the JCW brakes.....i would say neither, get 16s for the performance.
But with those OZ's, you can have your bling along with decent performance. The 18 ULs are only 16lbs. I personally dig all the feedback from a low profile tire on a big wheel. I run SL 18s with non-runflats and JCW suspension. 80 miles a day and loving it.
But with those OZ's, you can have your bling along with decent performance. The 18 ULs are only 16lbs. I personally dig all the feedback from a low profile tire on a big wheel. I run SL 18s with non-runflats and JCW suspension. 80 miles a day and loving it.
From what I've heard, the 18 lo pro non-runflats are typically about as rough as the 17" runflats...Haven't had a chance to drive a non-runflat car though...
From what I've heard, the 18 lo pro non-runflats are typically about as rough as the 17" runflats...Haven't had a chance to drive a non-runflat car though...
I found the stock 17 runflats to be a bit harsher than the non-runflat 18s.