Tires, Wheels, & Brakes Discussion about wheels, tires, and brakes for the new MINI.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Are these 17's or 18's?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 04-20-2006 | 07:54 PM
dmeyer's Avatar
dmeyer
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
Are these 17's or 18's?

Anyone know if these are 17s or 18s? This pic is from the OZ Racing site.
 
  #2  
Old 04-20-2006 | 07:58 PM
Rally@StanceDesign's Avatar
Rally@StanceDesign
Former Vendor
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,337
Likes: 4
From: oh10
It's probably a photoshop to be honest....


But it looks like 17's
 
  #3  
Old 04-20-2006 | 08:02 PM
dmeyer's Avatar
dmeyer
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
Trying to decide on 17" or 18" Ultraleggeras....
 
  #4  
Old 04-20-2006 | 08:06 PM
XAlfa's Avatar
XAlfa
Banned
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 0
From: Berkeley, CA
Originally Posted by dmeyer
Trying to decide on 17" or 18" Ultraleggeras....
What are your criteria?
 
  #5  
Old 04-20-2006 | 08:09 PM
dmeyer's Avatar
dmeyer
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
Originally Posted by XAlfa
What are your criteria?
Handling is key. I drove a JCW car that had the JCW suspension, the 18" JCW wheels and runflats. It was a bit too rough for me but i suspect thats because of the combination of all three.

I suppose the question is, what are the performance pros and cons of the sizes? I do not plan to use runflats.

Anyone have a pic of a car with JCW brakes that runs similar 18's?
 
  #6  
Old 04-20-2006 | 08:34 PM
Rally@StanceDesign's Avatar
Rally@StanceDesign
Former Vendor
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,337
Likes: 4
From: oh10
for exceptional handling, and acceleration...paired with price and the ability to run the JCW brakes.....i would say neither, get 16s for the performance.

18s are bling and nothing else.
 
  #7  
Old 04-20-2006 | 09:17 PM
XAlfa's Avatar
XAlfa
Banned
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 0
From: Berkeley, CA
But with those OZ's, you can have your bling along with decent performance. The 18 ULs are only 16lbs. I personally dig all the feedback from a low profile tire on a big wheel. I run SL 18s with non-runflats and JCW suspension. 80 miles a day and loving it.
 
  #8  
Old 04-20-2006 | 09:21 PM
dmeyer's Avatar
dmeyer
Thread Starter
|
3rd Gear
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
Originally Posted by XAlfa
But with those OZ's, you can have your bling along with decent performance. The 18 ULs are only 16lbs. I personally dig all the feedback from a low profile tire on a big wheel. I run SL 18s with non-runflats and JCW suspension. 80 miles a day and loving it.
From what I've heard, the 18 lo pro non-runflats are typically about as rough as the 17" runflats...Haven't had a chance to drive a non-runflat car though...
 
  #9  
Old 04-20-2006 | 09:26 PM
XAlfa's Avatar
XAlfa
Banned
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 0
From: Berkeley, CA
Originally Posted by dmeyer
From what I've heard, the 18 lo pro non-runflats are typically about as rough as the 17" runflats...Haven't had a chance to drive a non-runflat car though...
I found the stock 17 runflats to be a bit harsher than the non-runflat 18s.
 




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:22 PM.